<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Sotsialogicheski issledovania</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Sotsialogicheski issledovania</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0132-1625</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">3034-6010</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Russian Academy of Science</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31857/S013216250009389-0</article-id><title-group><article-title>The Sobornost: From the History of Russian Religious and Social Thought</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Соборность: из истории русской религиозной социальной мысли</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid"></contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Golovic</surname><given-names>Radoje</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Голович</surname><given-names>Радое </given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>madjo.golovic@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Университет Черногории</institution><institution xml:lang="en">University of Montenegro</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2020-04-27" publication-format="electronic"><day>27</day><month>04</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><issue>5</issue><fpage>122</fpage><lpage>126</lpage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The principle of sobornost expresses the syncretic and organic union of freedom and unity in communication between people, as well as their attitude towards society, nature, God and the world as a whole, and it essentially determines the Russian Orthodox culture. The spirit of sobornost represents the inner harmonious unity and communication of personality based on love. It is the guarantee of the personality’s autonomy and the saving corrective of each non-blessed and totalitarian pretension of the community (collective, state, and society) to depersonalize and subjugate it. As a result of such spiritual experience, the Russian culture avoided the extremes of individualism and collectivism that form the core of Western rationalist culture to which the principle of sobornost remained alien. The perspective of sobornost is the key to understanding the Russian religious, artistic, philosophical and sociological tradition. The idea of sobornost is a general metaphysical principle of not only thinking, singing and acting but also conditio sine qua non of the knowledge, morals, and faith of the Russian person. The intention to view the attitude of a person towards God and his/her position in the cosmos in a complete way as the unity in diversity (the ideal of cosmic sobornost) and the tendency to unite truth, goodness and beauty, knowledge and faith, thoughts and feelings synthetically and concretely (whole spirit, believing opinion and integral knowledge) represent the leitmotif of all spiritual creativity, beginning with Metropolitan of Kiev Hilarion, then Andrei Rublev, Pushkin, Khomyakov, Kireyevsky, Dostoyevsky, Tyutchev, Solovyov, Berdyaev, S. Trubetskoy, Frank, Sorokin, Ilyin, Panarin, and Semushkin.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Соборность для определенной части современного российского общества выступает важной идеологической категорией, но её истоки в русской философии, включая гносеологическое, антропологическое, социально-экономическое, эстетическое и этическое измерение, слабо рефлексируются. Статья предлагает видение идеи соборности в трудах русских религиозных философов XIX – начала XX века. Согласно их идеям материальным аналогом соборности является солидарность, и с ней неразрывно связан древний институт общения. По их мнению, соборность предполагает социальное единство людей и имеет этическую релевантность.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Sobornost</kwd><kwd>solidarity</kwd><kwd>spirituality</kwd><kwd>freedom</kwd><kwd>personality</kwd><kwd>community</kwd><kwd>faith</kwd><kwd>love</kwd><kwd>Russian idea</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>соборность</kwd><kwd>солидарность</kwd><kwd>духовность</kwd><kwd>свобода</kwd><kwd>личность</kwd><kwd>вера</kwd><kwd>русская идея</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>B1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бердяев Н.А. Алексей Степанович Хомяков М.: Путь, 1912.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Berdyaev N.A. (1912) Aleksey Stepanovich Khomyakov. Moscow: Putʹ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>B2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бердяев Н.А. Русская идея. Париж: YMCA-Press, 1971.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Berdyaev N.A. (1971) Russian Idea. Paris: YMCA-Press. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>B3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Булычев Ю.Ю. К вопросу об отношении начал соборности и об ественности в социальной жизни. // Православие и патриотизм. СПб.: Алетейя, 2005.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bulychev Yu.Yu. (2005) On the question of the relationship between the principles of conciliarity and morality in social life. In: Orthodoxy and Patriotism. St. Pepersburg: Aleteyya. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>B4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вышеславцев Б.П. Этика преображенного эроса. М.: Республика, 1994.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Florenskiy P.A. (1990) Essays. Vol. 2. Moscow: Pravda. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>B5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гулыга А.В. Русский философский ренессанс // Русская идея и современность. М.: Республика, 1992.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Florenskiy P.A. (2018) From the theological heritage. In: Theological works. Comp. No. 17. Moscow: PSTGU. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>B6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ильин И.А. Творческая идея нашего будущего. Об основах духовного характера. Новосибирск: Русский архив, 1991.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Frank S.L. (1930) Spiritual Foundations of Society. Introduction to Social Philosophy. Paris: YMCA-Press. (In Russ.) </mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>B7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лосский Н.О. История русской философии. М.: Советский писатель, 1991.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gulyga A.V. (1992) Russian Russian philosophical Renaissance. In: Russian Idea and Modernity. Moscow: Respublika. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>B8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Моторина Л.Е. Соборность. Нравственность, свобода и любовь, как начало человеческой личности в творчестве А.С. Хомякова // Мат. VII-х Всероссийских чтений «Оптина пустынь и русская культура». Калуга: КГПУ им. К.Э. Циолковского, 2009.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ilʹin I.A. (19991) Creative Idea of Our Future. About the Basics of Spiritual Character. Novosibirsk: Russkiy arkhiv. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>B9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Осипов И.Д. Категория соборности в политической философии славянофильства // Русская философия. Новые исследования и материалы (Проблем методологии и методики). СПб.: СПбГУ, 2001.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kholodnyy V.I. (1994) The Idea of Sobornost in Slavophilism. The Problem of the Cathedral of Epistemology. Moscow: Koffi. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>B10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сапов В.В. Соборность // Русская философия: Энциклопедия. М.: Алгоритм-Книга, 2007.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khomyakov A.S. (1994) About the Old and the New. Essay in 2 vol. Vol. 1. Moscow: Medium. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>B11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Соловьев В.С. Первый шаг к положительной эстетике. Соч. в 2 т. 2 изд. Т. 2. М.: Мысль, 1990.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Losskiy N.O. (1991) History of Russian Philosophy. Moscow: Sovetskiy pisatelʹ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>B12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Троицкий Е.С. О русской идее. Очерк теории возрождения нации. В 2 ч. М.: Русло, 1994.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Motorina L.E. (2009) Sobornost. Morality, freedom and love as the beginning of the human personality in the work of A. S. Khomyakova. In: Materials of the VII-x all-Russian readings &amp;quot;Optina Pustyn and Russian culture&amp;quot;. Kaluga: KGPU im. K.E. Tsiolkovskogo. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>B13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Трубецкой С.Н. Сочинения. М.: Мысль, 1994.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Osipov I.D. (2001) Category of sobornost in the political philosophy of Slavophilism. In: Russian philosophy. New research and materials (Problems of methodology and methodology). St. Pepersburg: SPbGU. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>B14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Флоренский П.А. Сочинения. Т.2. М.: Правда, 1990.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sapov V.V. (2007) Sobornost&amp;apos;. In: Russian Philosophy: Encyclopedia. Moscow: Algoritm-Kniga, 2007.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>B15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Флоренский П.А. Из богословского наследия // Богословские труды. Сб. № 17. М.: ПСТГУ, 2018.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Solovʹev V.S. (1990) The First Step to Positive Aesthetics. Essays in 2 vol. 2 ed. Vol. 2. Moscow: Myslʹ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>B16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Франк С.Л. Духовные основы общества. Введение в социальную философию. Париж: YMCA-Press, 1930.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Troitskiy E.S. (1994) About the Russian Idea. An Essay on the Theory of the Revival of the Nation. In 2 p. Moscow: Ruslo. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>B17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Холодный В.И. Идея соборности в славянофильстве. Проблема соборной гносеологии. М.: Коффи, 1994.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Trubetskoy S.N. (1994) Essays. Moscow: Myslʹ. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>B18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хомяков А.С. О старом и новом. Сочи. в 2 т. Т. 1. М.: Медиум, 1994.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vysheslavtsev B.P. (1994) Ethics of the transfigured Eros. Moscow: Respublika. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>