EFFECTIVE CONTRACT IN HIGHER EDUCATION:DETERMINANTS AND POTENTIALS FOR APPLICATION
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
EFFECTIVE CONTRACT IN HIGHER EDUCATION:DETERMINANTS AND POTENTIALS FOR APPLICATION
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000392-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Pages
127-132
Abstract
The article is focused on implementation of effective contract - a tool for assessing teaching personnel performance in higher education institutions. On the basis of a number of Russian cases related process is analayzed in regard to its effect on motivation and strategies of employees, its role in solving tasks universities face. Results reveal a distorted rendering and a limited understanding of such notions as ‘performance-related pay' and ‘effective contract'. Both tools are resorted to in rare particular situations in order to solve formal and tactical problems. Effective contract for academic workers is regarded as a way for conforming to the requirements of external authority bodies. It was revealed that the effective contract is currently represented as a fragmented system for managing teaching personnel performance and its elements are at different stages of development, implementation and application in higher education institutions. Existing managing traditions rely largely on indicators borrowed from higher authorities' systems for monitoring and control. It is noteworthy that indicators for assessing effectiveness and quality of teaching are almost not present. Higher education institutions tend to employ equalizing strategies that are common to them for payment schemes and incentive payments allocation thus leaving the motivational potential of the effective contract unrealized.
Keywords
performance-related pay, effective contract, higher education system, teaching personnel, motivation, quality, effectiveness, performance indicators
Date of publication
01.08.2016
Number of purchasers
1
Views
444
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Bryujn de H. Upravlenie po rezul'tatam v gosudarstvennom sektore / Per. s angl. M.: Institut kompleksnyh strategicheskih issledovanij, 2005.

Kurbatova M.V., Kagan E.S., Aparina N.F. Povedenie rabotnikov vuzov v usloviyah reformirovaniya vysshego professional'nogo obrazovaniya: problema vybora // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. № 2. S. 123–134.

Kuz'minov Ya.I. Akademicheskoe soobshchestvo i akademicheskie kontrakty: vyzovy i otvety poslednego vremeni // Kontrakty v akademicheskom mire / Sost. i nauch. red. M.M. Yudkevich. M.: Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki, 2011. S. 13–30.

Marsden D. The paradox of performance related pay systems: why do we keep using them in the face of evidence that they fail to motivate? CEP Discussion Papers. 945. London: Centre for Analysis and Social Exclusion, London School of Economics and Political Science, 2009.

Meyer I.H., Evans I.M. Motivating the professoriate: why sticks and carrots are only for donkeys // Higher education management and policy. 2003. № 15. P. 151–168.

OECD. Report. Performance Related Pay Policies for Government Employees. 2005.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate