RAS Social ScienceСоциологические исследования Sotsialogicheski issledovania

  • ISSN (Print) 0132-1625
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-6010

Achievements and Losses of Post-Soviet Transformation

PII
S013216250002783-4-1
DOI
10.31857/S013216250002783-4
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue 11
Pages
27-39
Abstract

On the materials of the monitoring research of the IS RAS (October 2017) it is shown that Putin’s epoch (2000–2010) is perceived by Russians much better than the Yeltsin period of history (1990’s). The Russians note the undoubted benefits from the point of view of potential growth opportunities as significant achievements of the 2000–2010, as well as highlight the cessation of the war in the Caucasus and the strengthening of Russia’s international position in the world. However, the achievements of this period are combined with the losses in many other (primarily economic) spheres and areas of life. In perception of the losses of the Post-Soviet society, Russians as a whole are unified: both relative and absolute losses are seen by them equally regardless of age. At the same time generational differences affect the assessment of all areas of V. Putin’s activity: the older are respondents, the worse they assessed his policy. As a result, the comparison of acquisitions and losses of society, as well as the analysis of the perception of the V. Putin’s activities success give a rather ambiguous assessment of Post-Soviet development. If the stagnation of the Russian economy is not overcome in the nearest future, it may obliterate all past achievements and actualize failures in development.

Keywords
Post-Soviet society, age differentiation, Putin’s era, Yeltsin’s era, achievements and losses of Post-Soviet development
Date of publication
12.12.2018
Year of publication
2018
Number of purchasers
10
Views
819

References

  1. 1. Belyaeva L.A., Lapin N.I. (red.) Krizisnyj sotsium. Nashe obschestvo v trekh izmereniyakh. M.: IF RAN, 1994.
  2. 2. Vladimir Putin: prezidentstvo i liderstvo. M.: Tsentr politicheskogo analiza, Ehkspertnyj institut sotsial'nykh issledovanij, 2017.
  3. 3. Gimpel'son V., Kapelyushnikov R., Ratnikova T. Veliki li glaza u strakha? Strakh bezrabotitsy i gibkost' zarabotnoj platy v Rossii // Monitoring obschestvennogo mneniya: ehkonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny. 2003. № 4. S. 44–58.
  4. 4. Golenkova Z.T. Osnovnye tendentsii transformatsii sotsial'noj struktury rossijskogo obschestva // Vestnik RUDN. Seriya «Sotsiologiya». 2001. № 1. S. 28–43.
  5. 5. Doktorov B.Z., Oslon A.A., Petrenko E.S. Ehpokha El'tsina: mneniya rossiyan. Sotsiologicheskie ocherki. M.: Institut Fonda «Obschestvennoe mnenie», 2002.
  6. 6. Zaslavskaya T.I. Sovremennoe rossijskoe obschestvo: problemy i perspektivy // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2004. № 5. S. 5–15.
  7. 7. Zaslavskaya T.I. Sovremennoe rossijskoe obschestvo: problemy i perspektivy // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2004. № 6. S. 5–18
  8. 8. Levashov V.K. Rossijskoe obschestvo: 25 let neoliberal'nykh reform // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2016. № 11. S. 45–54.
  9. 9. Simonyan R.Kh., Kochegarova T.M. Rossijskie reformatory 1990-kh gg.: opyt biograficheskogo issledovaniya // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2016. № 5. S. 146–155.
  10. 10. Shkaratan O.I., Yastrebov G.A. (red.) Nova li novaya Rossiya. M.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2016.
  11. 11. Yadov V.A. Rossiya kak transformiruyuscheesya obschestvo (rezyume mnogoletnej diskussii sotsiologov) // Obschestvo i ehkonomika. 1999. № 10-11. S. 65–72.
  12. 12. Yadov V.A. (red.) Sotsial'nye transformatsii v Rossii: teorii, praktiki, sravnitel'nyj analiz. Uchebnoe posobie. M.: MPSI, 2005.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library