RAS Social ScienceСоциологические исследования Sotsialogicheski issledovania

  • ISSN (Print) 0132-1625
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-6010

Sociological imagination: challenges and resources

PII
S0132162525030019-1
DOI
10.31857/S0132162525030019
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue number 3
Pages
3-14
Abstract
This article explores the “sociological imagination” concept within the field of sociology, particularly its role in theoretical work. Professions often claim unique knowledge and skills that grant them exclusive expertise. Sociologists, similarly, frequently invoke specific modes of thinking, such as critical sociological thinking and the sociological imagination, as essential to their professional identity and the comprehension of social reality. This study examines early interpretations of the sociological imagination by Everett Hughes and Arnold Rose in the 1960s. Hughes viewed it as a counter to over-professionalization, urging sociologists to explore beyond established patterns. He advocated for broad applications, from creating societal models to addressing specific problems. Rose critiqued C. Wright Mills’ concept, linking it to sympathetic introspection. He identified diverse types of sociological imagination tied to micro/macro perspectives, historical context, and analytical distance. Both underscored the importance of imagination in sociological thinking, offering insights relevant to contemporary challenges in the discipline and sociological education. The study advocates integrating the reading of “The Sociological Imagination” with training in analytical skills, using metaphors, diverse data, theoretical knowledge, and alternative approaches like Abbott’s lyrical sociology. The study concludes by noting that rigid requirements limit individual expression of imagination, narrowing the diversity of academic publications.
Keywords
Ч.Р. Миллс социологическое воображение теория поэтика социологическое мышление
Date of publication
10.11.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
70

References

  1. 1. Абрамов Р. Н. Дефиниционистские метафоры в теоретической социологии // Социологический журнал. 2008. № 4. С. 23–34.
  2. 2. Абрамов Р. Н., Кожанов А. А. Академическая компетентность и критическое социологическое мышление как ключевые элементы профессиональной подготовки социолога // Россия в глобализирующемся мире: мировоззренческие и социокультурные аспекты. Томск: ТГПУ, 2004. С. 117–121.
  3. 3. Бауман З. Мыслить социологически. М.: Аспект Пресс, 1996.
  4. 4. Буравой М. Комментарий: за глобальную социологию низших слоев? // Социологические исследования. 2009. № 4. С. 14–20.
  5. 5. Вордсворт У. Предисловие к «Лирическим балладам» // Зарубежная литература XIX века: Романтизм: Хрестоматия историко-литературных материалов. М.: Высш. шк., 1990. С. 195–215.
  6. 6. Гидденс Э. Социология. М.: Эдиториал УРСС, 1999.
  7. 7. Гребер Д. Утопия правил: о технологиях, глупости и тайном обаянии бюрократии. М.: Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2016.
  8. 8. Девятко И. Ф. Стадии эволюции и проблема классификации исторических типов общества // Россия реформирующаяся. Ежегодник / Отв. ред. М. К. Горшков. Вып. 7. М.: ИС РАН, 2008. С. 23–39.
  9. 9. Джеймисон Ф. Постмодернизм, или Культурная логика позднего капитализма / Пер. с англ. Д. Кралечкина; под науч ред. А. Олейникова. М.: Ин-т Гайдара, 2019.
  10. 10. Кисленко И. Ю. Южная теория: существует ли социология за пределами западного канона? // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2022. № 1 С. 226–244.
  11. 11. Abbott A. Against Narrative: A Preface to Lyrical Sociology // Sociological Theory. 2007. Vol. 25. No. 1. P. 67–99.
  12. 12. Abbott A. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.
  13. 13. Brewer J. D. Imagining The Sociological Imagination: The Biographical Context of a Sociological Classic // The British Journal of Sociology. 2004. Vol. 55. No. 3. P. 317–333.
  14. 14. Denzin N. K. Presidential Address on “The Sociological Imagination” Revisited // The Sociological Quarterly. 1990. Vol. 31. No. 1. P. 1–22.
  15. 15. Goodwin Ch. Professional Vision // American Anthropologist. 1994. New Series. Vol. 96. No. 3. P. 606–633.
  16. 16. Hughes E. C. Race Relations and the Sociological Imagination // American Sociological Review. 1963. Vol. 28. No. 6. P. 879–890.
  17. 17. Il-Tschung L. The imaginary as method. “Lyrical sociology” as a heuristic of sociological description // Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie. 2019. Vol. 44. P. 139–155.
  18. 18. Jessop B. On Academic Capitalism // Critical Policy Studies. 2017. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 104–109.
  19. 19. Kunda G. Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in High-Tech Industry. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2006.
  20. 20. Parson L., Ozaki C. C. Gendered Student Ideals in STEM in Higher Education // NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education. 2017. Vol. 11. No. 2. P. 171–190.
  21. 21. Parson L., Steele A., Wilkins E. A Gendered “Ideal?” Discourses that Characterize the Ideal Scientist // The International Journal of Gender Science and Technology. 2021. Vol. 13. No. 1. P. 64–85.
  22. 22. Riesman D. The Lonely Crowd: A Study of the Changing American Character. L.: Yale Univ. Press, 1970.
  23. 23. Rose A. M. Varieties of Sociological Imagination // American Sociological Review. 1969. Vol. 34. No. 5. P. 623–630.
  24. 24. Schmidt J. F.K. Niklas Luhmann’s Card Index: Thinking Tool, Communication Partner, Publication Machine // Forgetting Machines: Knowledge Management Evolution in Early Modern Europe / Ed. by A. Cevolini. N. Y.: Brill, 2016. P. 289–311.
  25. 25. Slaughter S., Rhoades G. Academic Capitalism and the New Economy: Markets, State and Higher Education. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004.
  26. 26. Teaching with Sociological Imagination in Higher and Further Education: Contexts, Pedagogies, Reflections / Ed. by Ch. R. Matthews, U. Edgington, A. Channon. L.: Springer, 2017.
  27. 27. Wakeman S. Fieldwork, biography and emotion: doing criminological Autoethnography // The British Journal of Criminology. 2014. Vol. 54. No. 5. P. 705–721.
  28. 28. Yaghoobi A. Metaphorical explanation of Anthony Giddens’ sociological imagination based on the theory of conceptual blending // Sociological Review. 2021. Vol. 28. No. 1. P. 229–252.
  29. 29. Zorbaugh H. W. The Gold Coast and the Slum: A Sociological Study of Chicago’s Near North Side. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1929.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library