Везде
The «Genetic Body»: Politics of Genetic Reductionism in Contemporary Natural Sciences
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
The «Genetic Body»: Politics of Genetic Reductionism in Contemporary Natural Sciences
Annotation
PII
S023620070007674-8-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Greg B. Yudin 
Occupation: Senior Researcher, Laboratory for Studies in Economic Sociology; Professor, Moscow School of Social and Economic Sciences
Affiliation:
Higher School of Economics
Moscow School of Social and Economic Sciences
Address: 11, room 530, Myasnitskaya str., 101000 Moscow, Russian Federation
Edition
Volume 30 Issue 6
Pages
100-111
Abstract

Recent rapid developments in genetics result in gradual geneticization of human sociality. A number of studies aims to reduce significant forms of social behavior, such as political attitudes, to genetically conditioned predispositions. This paper addresses three key questions: 1) what is the scientific validity of these reductionist theories? 2) what can be inferred from the expansion of these theories about the changing relationship between the biological and the social? 3) what are the political meaning and consequences of these research programs? Instead of treating political issues from a genetic perspective, this paper adopts a political-philosophical view on genetics. It is argued that 1) the genetic accounts of politics result in naturalization of contingent social facts, such as liberal\conservative distinction; 2) perceiving body as genome produces a «substruction» of the lifeworld, a new mode of experiencing human being; 3) reduction of political conflicts to genetic variation operates as a strategy for externalization of political opponent, for othering that which is «fundamentally different by nature».

Keywords
genetics, political attitudes, biosociality, body, naturalism, political conflict
Received
12.12.2019
Date of publication
12.12.2019
Number of purchasers
78
Views
2051
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S023620070007674-8-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 25.11.2019
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Husserl E. Krizis evropeyskih nauk i transtsendentalnaya fenomenologiya [Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie: transl. from German]. Мoscow: Vladimir Dal Publ., 2004.

2. Dilthey W. Postroenie istoricheskogo mira v naukakh o dukhe [The Formation of the Historical World in the Human Sciences]. Dilthey W. The Collected Works: in 6 vol. V. 3. Мoscow: Tri kvadrata Publ., 2004.

3. Malabou C. Chto nam delat’ s nashim mozgom [Que faire de notre cerveau?: transl. from French]. Мoscow: V–A–C press, 2019.

4. Schmitt C. Ponyatie politicheskogo [Der Begriff des Politischen: transl. from German]. Voprosy sotsiologii. 1992. N 1. С. 37–67.

5. Charney E., English W. Candidate Genes and Political Behavior. American Political Science Review. 2012. Vol. 106, N 1. P. 1–34.

6. Dawes C., Fowler J. Partisanship, Voting, and the Dopamine D2 Receptor Gene. Journal of Politics. 2009. Vol. 71, N 3. P. 1157–1171.

7. Foucault M. Naissance de la clinique. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2009.

8. Fowler J., Dawes C. In Defense of Genopolitics. American Political Science Review. 2013. Vol 107, N 2. P. 362–374.

9. Hartz L. The Liberal Tradition in America. Orlando: Harcourt, 1991.

10. Hatemi P., Gillespie N., Eaves L. et al. A Genome-Wide Analysis of Liberal and Conservative Political Attitudes. The Journal of Politics. 2011. Vol. 73, N 1. P. 271–285

11. Hatemi P., Medland S., Klemmensen R. et al. Genetic Influences on Political Ideologies: Twin Analyses of 19 Measures of Political Ideologies from Five Democracies and Genome-Wide Findings from Three Populations. Behavioral Genetics. 2014. Vol. 44, N 3. P. 282–294.

12. Husserl E. Ideen II. Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution. Husserliana IV. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1952.

13. Illitch I. Limits to medicine. Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health. London: Penguin Books, 1976.

14. Jost J., Amodio D. Political Ideology as Motivated Social Cognition: Behavioral and Neuroscientific Evidence. Motivation and Emotion. 2012. Vol. 36, N. 1. P. 55–64.

15. Jost J., Glaser J., Kruglanski A., Sulloway F. Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition. Psychological Bulletin. 2003. Vol. 129, N 3. P. 339–375.

16. Kanai R., Feilden T., Firth C., Rees G. Political Orientations Are Correlated with Brain Structure in Young Adults. Current Biology. 2011. Vol. 21, N 8. P. 677–680.

17. Lakoff S. Tocqueville, Burke, and the Origins of Liberal Conservatism. The Review of Politics. 1998. Vol. 60, N 3. P. 435–464.

18. Mouffe C. Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London; N.Y.: Verso, 2013.

19. Rabinow P. Artificiality and Enlightenment: From Sociobiology to Biosociality. Mario Biagioli (ed.), The Science Studies Reader. N.Y.: Routledge, 1999. P. 407–416.

20. Zamboni G., Gozzi M., Krueger F. et al. Individualism, Conservatism, and Radicalism as Criteria for Processing Political Beliefs: A Parametric fMRI Study. Social Neuroscience. 2009. Vol. 4, N 5. P. 367–383.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate