Везде
Against Naturalism. On Rational Strategies and Role of Idealizations
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Against Naturalism. On Rational Strategies and Role of Idealizations
Annotation
PII
S023620070019509-6-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Konstantin A. Pavlov-Pinus 
ORCID: 0000-0002-9258-3498
Affiliation: RAS Institute of Philosophy
Address: Российская Федерация, 109240 Москва, ул. Гончарная, д. 12, стр. 1
Edition
Volume 33 Issue 2
Pages
25-45
Abstract

The article outlines the main hypotheses of the research program "Thinking, consciousness and freedom". The cluster of concepts consciousness-meaningfulness-autonomy-rationality-(in)determinism-subjectivity-idealization is under consideration. The significance of transcendentalist disposition for theories of consciousness striving for maximum consistency with reliable results of modern sciences is substantiated. On the one hand, mutually compatible variants of interpretations of the above-mentioned concepts are analyzed; on the other hand, conceptual constellations leading to the effects of theoretical trivialization of basic forms of human knowledge and self-understanding are revealed. The importance of conjugacy of the phenomenon of rational activity and the processes of (re)establishing autonomy is emphasized. Special attention is paid to the metaphysical presumptions underlying a number of scientific theories, and, accordingly, to the issue of existential and metaphysical self-determination of modern man.

Keywords
consciousness, idealization, autonomy, rationality, (in)determinism, subjectivity, authorship
Received
06.04.2022
Date of publication
11.05.2022
Number of purchasers
12
Views
719
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S023620070019509-6-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 06.04.2022
Cite Download pdf

References

1. Gutner G.B. Risk i otvetstvennost' sub'ekta kommunikativnogo dejstviya. M.: Institut filosofii RAN — Svyato-Filaretovskij pravoslavno-khristianskij institut, 2008.

2. Gutner G.B. Risk i otvetstvennost' sub"ekta kommunikativnogo dejstviya [Risk and responsibility of the subject of a communicative act]. Institut filosofii RAN — Svyato-Filaretovskij pravoslavno-hristianskij institute Publ., 2008.

3. Nepejvoda N.N. Prikladnaya logika. Izdatel'stvo Novosibirskogo universiteta, 2000.

4. Nepejvoda N. N. Prikladnaya logika [Applied logic]. Novosibirsk University Publ., 2000.

5. Pavlov-Pinus K.A. Smysl i usloviya vozmozhnosti avtonomnoj ratsional'nosti. Filosofskie problemy informatsionnykh tekhnologij i kiberprostranstva. 2018. № 2(15). S. 50–71.

6. Pavlov-Pinus K.A. Smysl i usloviya vozmozhnosti avtonomnoj racional'nosti [Meaning and conditions of possibility of autonomous rationality] Filosofskie problemy informacionnyh tekhnologij i kiberprostranstva. 2018. N 2(15). P. 50–71.

7. Pavlov-Pinus K.A. Ponyatie universal'nosti v ramkakh kibernetiki vtorogo poryadka. Vox. Filosofskij zhurnal. №34, 2021. URL: https://vox-journal.org/html/issues/612/617 (data obrascheniya: 10.02.2022)

8. Pavlov-Pinus K.A. Ponyatie universal'nosti v ramkah kibernetiki vtorogo poryadka [The concept of universality in the framework of second-order cybernetics] Vox. Filosofskij zhurnal. 2021. N 34. URL: https://vox-journal.org/html/issues/612/617 (date of access: 10.02.2022)

9. Porus V.N. Mnogomernost' ratsional'nosti. Ehpistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2010. T. XXIII, №1. S. 5–16.

10. Porus V.N. Mnogomernost' racional'nosti [Multidimensionality of rationality]. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2010. Vol. XXIII. N 1. P. 5–16.

11. Porus V.N., Metafora i ratsional'nost'. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. №1, 2005, S.134–141.

12. Porus V.N., Metafora i racional'nost' [Metaphor and rationality]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2005. N 1. P. 134–141.

13. Sasskind L. Kosmicheskij landshaft. Teoriya strun i illyuziya razumnogo zamysla Vselennoj / per. s angl. SPb.: Piter, 2015.

14. Susskind L. Kosmicheskij landshaft. Teoriya strun i illyuziya razumnogo zamysla Vselennoj [The cosmic landscape. String theory and the illusion of Intelligent design]. Transl. from Eng. St.-Petersburg: Piter Publ., 2015.

15. Serl' Dzh.R. Ratsional'nost' v dejstvii / per. na russkij yazyk A. Kolodij, E. Rumyantsevoj. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2004.

16. Searle J. Racional'nost' v dejstvii [Rationality in action]. Transl. from Eng. by A. Kolodij, E. Rumyanceva. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2004.

17. Dennett D., From Bacteria to Bach and Back: The Evolution of Minds. W. W. Norton & Company, 2017.

18. Hofstadter D. Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies: Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of Thought. New York: Basic Books, 1995.

19. Ludwig David and Stéphanie Ruphy, "Scientific Pluralism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2021 Edition. Edward N. Zalta (ed.). URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/scientific-pluralism. (date of access: 10.02.2022)

20. On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models. Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM), Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI), Stanford University. URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2108.07258.pdf. (date of access: 10.02.2022)

21. Russel B. Principles of Mathematics. London, New York, 2010.

22. Searle J. R. The Word Turned Upside Down. The New York Review of Books, 1983. P. 74–79.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate