Везде
ВТОРАЯ СИРМИЙСКАЯ ФОРМУЛА: ИСТОРИЧЕСКИЙ КОНТЕКСТ И БОГОСЛОВСКОЕ СОДЕРЖАНИЕ
Оглавление
Аннотация Оценить Содержание публикации
Библиография Комментарии
Поделиться
QR
Метрика
ВТОРАЯ СИРМИЙСКАЯ ФОРМУЛА: ИСТОРИЧЕСКИЙ КОНТЕКСТ И БОГОСЛОВСКОЕ СОДЕРЖАНИЕ
Аннотация
Код статьи
S0321-03910000402-8-1
Тип публикации
Статья
Статус публикации
Опубликовано
Авторы
Захаров Георгий Евгеньевич 
Выпуск
Выпуск №2
Страницы
149-165
Аннотация
This article is devoted to the history of making of the second creed of Sirmium (357) and its doctrinal content. This text is one of the theological manifestos written in the epoch of the Arian controversy. The sources give us little information about the circumstances of composition and the motives of the authors of this document. Hilary of Poitiers attributes this creed to the bishops Ossius of Cordova (one of leaders of the homoousian party) and Potamius of Lisbon. According to his evidence these two bishops wrote the second creed of Sirmium in presence of three Illyrian bishops Ursacius, Valens and Germinius. But the obvious subordinationism of the creed leads the scholars to the assertion that the creed was composed by Ursacius, Valens, Germinius and Potamius, and Ossius only signed it. Modern church historians often connect the proclamation of the second creed of Sirmium with church politics of the emperor Constantius II, who struggled with the homoousian opposition in the western part of Empire. The adoption of such a radical theological manifesto is regarded as a victory of the pro-Arian party. But this interpretation of the creed does not take in consideration the original and inconsistent structure of the text which combines both traditional moderate and untraditional radical theological elements. This fact leads us to the conclusion that the second creed of Sirmium is not a new offi cial theological confession for the whole Catholic Church but includes the traditional and moderate personal confession of faith composed by Ossius (probably in collaboration with Potamius) and the radical commentaries added by Ursacius, Valens and Germinius. After the adaptation by Ossius of a new version of his confession Illyrian bishops restored a Eucharistic communion with him. The central idea of the theological commentaries of Illyrian bishops is that of absolute submission of all creatures to God the Son and of subordination of God the Son in all things to God the Father. Thus, in the theological aspect the second creed of Sirmium can be interpreted as an attempt to stop the theological discussion by the passage from «the theology of substance» to «the theology of relation».
Классификатор
Дата публикации
01.04.2010
Всего подписок
2
Всего просмотров
508
Оценка читателей
0.0 (0 голосов)
Цитировать   Скачать pdf

Библиография



Дополнительные библиографические источники и материалы

    

  1. Simonetti M. Arianesimo latino//Studi Medievali. 1967. VIII. Fasc. 2. P. 682-683.
    2. 

  2. Hanson R.P.C. The Search for the Christian Doctrine of God. The Arian Controversy, 318-381. L.-N.Y., 2007. P. 557, 575.
    3. 

  3. Hilar. De synod. 11: Cum nonnulla putaretur esse de fi de disceptatio, diligenter omnia apud Sirmium tractata sunt et discussa, praesentibus sanctissimis fratribus et coepiscopis nostris, Valente, Ursacio et Germinio.
    4. 

  4. Löhr W.A. A Sense of Tradition: the Homoiousian Church Party//Arianism after Arius. Essays on the Development of the IVth Century Trinitarian Confl icts/Ed. M.R. Barnes, D.H. Williams. Edinburg, 1993. Р. 81-100;
    5. 

  5. Weedman M. Hilary and the Homoiousians: Using New Categories to map the Trinitarian Controversy//Church History. 2007. 76. 3. P. 491-510.
    6. 

  6. Pietri Ch. La politique de Constance II: un premier césaropapisme ou l'imitatio Constantini?//L'Eglise et l'empire au IVe siècle. Genève, 1989. P. 166
    7. 

  7. Болотов В.В. История Церкви в период Вселенских Соборов. М., 2007. С. 102         
    8. 

  8. Спасский А.А. История догматических движений в эпоху вселенских соборов. Сергиев Посад, 1914 (1995). С. 344
    9. 

  9. Williams D.H. Another Exception to Later Fourth-Century «Arian» Typologies: The Case of Germinius of Sirmium.//Journal of Early Christian Studies. 1996. №4. P. 342
    10. 

  10. Ambrose of Milan and the End of the Nicene-Arian Confl icts. Oxf., 1995. P. 19.
    11. 

  11. Gvatkin H.M. Studies of Arianism. Cambr.-L., 1900. P. 161-162;
    12. 

  12. Batiffol P. La Paix Constantinienne et le Catholicisme. P., 1929. P. 477
    13. 

  13. De Clercq V. Ossius of Cordova. A Contribution to the Hisory of the Constantinian Period. Washington, 1954. P. 519-525
    14. 

  14. Moreira A. Potamius de Lisbonne et la controverse arienne. Louvain, 1969. P. 145
    15. 

  15. Meslin M. Les Ariens d'Occident. 335-430. P., 1967. P. 276-278
    16. 

  16. Pietri Ch. De la partitio de l'Empire chrétien à l'unité sous Constance: la querelle arienne et le premier «césaropapisme»//Histoire du christianisme. Т. II. P., 1995. P. 324
    17. 

  17. Ayres L. Nicaea and its Legacy. An Approach to Fourth-Century Trinitarian Theology. Oxf.-N.Y., 2004. P. 137.
    18. 

  18. Simonetti M. La crisi ariana nel IV secolo. Roma, 1975. P. 229-230
    19. 

  19. Hefele K. Conciliengeschichte. Bd I. Freiburg, 1873. S. 676;
    20. 

  20. Newman J.H. Arians of IV century. London-New York-Bombay-Calcutta, 1908. P. 425;
    21. 

  21. Barnes. Op. cit. P. 231-232;
    22. 

  22. Ayres. Op. cit. P. 137;
    23. 

  23. Gvatkin. Op. cit. P. 161;
    24. 

  24. Simonetti. La crisi... P. 229;
    25. 

  25. Hanson. Op. cit. P. 343
    26. 

  26. Zeiller J. Les origines chrétiennes dans les provinces danubiennes de l'Empire Romain. P., 1918. Р. 276;
    27. 

  27. Bardy G. L'Occident en face de la crise arienne//Irénikon 1939. 16. №5. P. 414;
    28. 

  28. Batiffol. Op. cit. P. 477;
    29. 

  29. Meslin. Les Ariens… P. 278;
    30. 

  30. Gvatkin. Op. cit. P. 162;
    31. 

  31. Moreira. Op. cit. P. 111;
    32. 

  32. De Clercq. Op. сit. P. 480, 514;
    33. 

  33. Kelly. J.N.D. Early Christian Creeds. Harlow, 1981. P. 287;
    34. 

  34. Duval Y.-M. Aquilée et Sirmium durant la crise arienne (325-400)//Idem. L'extirpation de l'Arianisme en Italie du Nord et en Occident. Aldershot, Brookfi eld, Singapore, Sydney, 1998. P. 348; Duchesne. Op. cit. P. 285;
    35. 

  35. Pietri. De la partitio... P. 324;
    36. 

  36. Самуилов. Ук. соч. С. 53-54. 32
    37. 

  37. Самуилов. Ук. соч. С. 53;
    38. 

  38. Спасский. Ук. соч. С. 343-344;
    39. 

  39. Zeiller. Op. cit. P. 276;
    40. 

  40. Meslin. Les Ariens... P. 276-278;
    41. 

  41. Pietri. De la partitio... P. 323.
    42. 

  42. Brennecke. Hilarius... S. 315-316.
    43. 

  43. Brennecke. Hilarius … S. 323-324.
    44. 

  44. Löhr W.A. Die Entstehung der homöischen und homöusianischen Kirchenparteien. Studien zur Synodalgeschichte des IV Jahrhunderts. Witterschlick, Bonn, 1986. S. 47-48.
    45. 

  45. Simonetti. La crisi… P. 233; idem. Arianesimo latino. P. 674.
    46. 

  46. Hanson. Op. cit. P. 557, 567.
    47.

Комментарии

Сообщения не найдены

Написать отзыв
Перевести