Везде
THE SOURCES AND CHARACTER OF MAGISTRATES ' RIGHT TO AUSPICATE: AN ANALYSIS OF THE RENUNTIATIO
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
THE SOURCES AND CHARACTER OF MAGISTRATES ' RIGHT TO AUSPICATE: AN ANALYSIS OF THE RENUNTIATIO
Annotation
PII
S0321-03910000402-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Andrey Smorchkov 
ORCID: 0000-0002-4461-4026
Edition
Issue 1
Pages
31-49
Abstract
The author examines sacral aspects of renuntiatio, i.e. of announcing the winner of the election. He maintains that the act gave the magistrate the right to public auspices, an essential part and sacral basis of magistrate's competence. The case of faulty election of M. Claudius Marcellus in 215 BC is reconsidered. Before the magistratus designatus was inducted into office, his right to take auspices remained latent as well as his potestas. Jupiter's participation in the electoral procedure showed itself in two ways: he expressed his approval of the action itself (comitia) through the auspices conducted by the leaders of electoral comitia in the night before they were held and his approval of the choice made by the community. The approval came in the form of a lot, which determined the order of announcing the results of the vote in the community. Casting lots was an auspicial procedure; but Jupiter did not express his opinion about the new magistrate's person. Choosing the person was the business of the community, its exclusive right. Republican political practice did not know any kind of special «divine investiture». Thus, magistrate's competence in the sacral field depended on whether or not he received political power, which fits in well with the basic principles of sacral and political organization of the civitas.
Date of publication
01.01.2010
Number of purchasers
2
Views
539
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials


 Hägerström A. Das magistratische ius in seinem Zusammenhang mit der römischen Sakralrechte. Uppsala, 1929. S. 19. Anm. 1; S. 20-23;
 Levi A. Auspicio imperio ductu felicitate//Rendiconti. Istituto Lombardo di Scienze e Lettere. 1938. Vol. 71. P. 107;
 Staveley E.S. The Constitution of the Roman Republic (1940-1954)//Historia. 1956. V. 1. P. 84-90;
 Catalano P. Contributi allo studio del diritto augurale. Torino, 1960. P. 469, 479-486;
 Magdelain A. Recherches sur l'imperium. La loi curiate et les auspices d'investiture. P., 1968. P. 16-20, 36-38;
 Develin R. Lex curiata and the competence of magistrates//Mnemosyne. 1977. Ser. IV. Vol. XXX. Fasc. 1. P. 53-54, 59, 64-65;
 Bleicken J. Zum Begriff der römischen Amtsgewalt: auspicium -potestas -imperium//Nachrichten der Akad. der Wiss. in Göttingen. Philol.-hist. Kl. 1981. № 9. S. 269-271;
 Giovannini A. Consulare imperium. Basel, 1983. P. 44-56;
 Magistratur und Volk. Ein Beitrag zur Entstehunggeschichte des Staatsrechts//Staat und Staatlichkeit in der frühen römischen Republik. Stuttgart, 1990. S. 434-436;
 Badian E. Kommentar zu Sektion V «Magistratur und Gesellschaft»//Ibid. S. 467;
 Stewart R. Public Office in Early Rome. Ann Arbor, 1998. P. 22, 34, 116, 182;
 Pokrovskij I.A. Istoriya rimskogo prava. SPb., 1998. S. 92;              
 Tokmakov V.N. Kuriatnye komitsii i voennye magistratury v Rannem Rime//Vlast', chelovek, obschestvo v antichnom mire. M., 1997. S. 125;
 Dement'eva. Rimskoe respublikanskoe mezhdutsarstvie. S. 58, 60.
 Smorchkov A.M. Kuriatnyj zakon ob imperii i auspitsii magistratov//IVS ANTIQVVM. Drevnee pravo. 2003. № 1 (11). S. 24-39.
 Nicholls J.J. The Content of the Lex Curiata//AJPh. 1967. 88. № 3. P. 261 (kratkoe zamechanie);
 Heuss A. Gedanken und Vermutungen zur frühen römischen Regierungsgewalt//Nachrichten der Akad. der Wiss. in Göttingen. Philol.-hist. Kl. 1982. № 10. S. 441 (kratkoe zamechanie), sr. 445. Ehti issledovateli govoryat o creatio v tselom, kontseptsii s bolee konkretnymi formulirovkami budut rassmotreny dalee.
 Kunkel W. Zum römischen Königtum//Idem. Kleine Schriften. Weimar, 1974. S. 359. Sr.
 Gioffredi C. Sulle attribuzioni sacrali dei magistrati romani//Iura. 1958. IX. 1. P. 27.
 Linderski J. The Augural Law//ANRW. II. Bd 16. 3. B.-N.Y., 1986. P. 2169.
 Magdelain A. Note sur la loi curiate et les auspices des magistrates//Revue historique de droit français et étranger. 1964. XLII. № 2. P. 201 (= Idem. Ius imperium auctoritas. Études de droit romain. Rome, 1990. P. 310). 7
 Magdelain. Recherches... P. 36-37.
 Rilinger R. Der Einfluss des Wahlleiters bei den römischen Konsulwahlen von 366 bis 50 v. Chr. München, 1976 (osob. S. 144-151, 174-186);
 Giovannini. Magistratur und Volk... S. 418-426.
 Klingmüller. Renuntiatio//RE. II R. Hlbd 1. 1914. Sp. 600-601.
 Herzog E. Geschichte und System der römischen Staatsverfassung. Bd 1. Lpz, 1884. S. 660-661.
 Lange L. De magistratuum Romanorum renuntiatione et de centuriatorum comitiorum forma recentiore//Idem. Kleine Schriften aus dem Gebiete der classischen Alterthumswissenschaft. Bd 2. Göttingen, 1887. P. 463-493;
 Staveley E.S. Greek and Roman Voting and Elections. Ithaca (N.Y.), 1972. P. 177-181.
 Ernout A., Meillet A. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue Latine. P., 1939. P. 687-688.
 Mommsen. Op. cit. Bd III. 1. S. 399. Anm. 1; S. 409.
 Taylor L.R. Roman Voting Assemblies from the Hannibalic War to the Dictatorship of Caesar. Ann Arbor, 1966. P. 85-98
 Hall U. Voting procedure in Roman assemblies//Historia. 1964. XIII. 3. P. 279-283
 Herzog. Op. cit. Bd 1. S. 1184
 Cic. Pro Mur. 18, 35; In Pis. 2; De imp. Cn. Pomp. 2; Brut. 321; Liv. VII. 5. 9; XXIX. 22. 5; Plut. Cic. 9; C. Gracch. 3; Caes. 5.
 Lange L. Römische Alterthümer. Bd 1. 3. Aufl B., 1879. S. 704, sr. S. 703.
 Taylor L.R., Broughton T.R S. The Order of the Two Consuls' Names in the Yearly Lists // MAAR. 1949. 19. P. 1-15; iidem. The Order of the Consuls' Names in Official Republican Lists // Historia. 1968. 17. 2. P. 166-171; Rilinger. Op. cit. S. 40-59.
 Rosenstein N. Sorting out the Lot in Republican Rome//AJPh. 1995. 116. 1. P. 58-62.
 Staveley. Greek... P. 155-156.
 Staveley. Greek... P. 155, 179.
 Mommsen. Op. cit. Bd III. 1. S. 412. Anm. 1. Sm., v chastnosti: Cic. Pro Planc. 35; De Domo. 79-80; Front. De aq. 129. 1.
 Rosenstein. Op. cit. P. 43-69 (po povodu prerogativnoj tsenturii sm. P. 58-62
 Taylor. Op. cit. P. 80 (sr. P. 73-74);
 Rosenstein. Op. cit. P. 57. Not. 51;
 Taylor. Op. cit. P. 74. Not. 32.
 Stewart R. The Jug and Lituus on Roman Republican Coins: Ritual Symbols and Political Power//Phoenix. 1997. 51. № 2. P. 171-178
 Linderski. The Augural Law. P. 2169
 Linderski. The Augural Law. P. 2170-2171.
 Linderski. The Augural Law... P. 2168-2169.
 Linderski. The Augural Law... P. 2159. Not. 37; P. 2160
 Gioffredi. Op. cit. P. 28.
 Dement'eva V.V. Magistratura diktatora v rannej Rimskoj respublike (V-III vv. do n.eh.). Yaroslavl', 1996. S. 52.
 Fyustel' de Kulanzh N.D. Drevnyaya grazhdanskaya obschina/Per. N.N. Spiridonova. M., 1895. S. 167-170
 Klingmüller. Op. cit. Sp. 600.
 Lange. Römische Alterthümer. Bd 1. S. 719.
 Bleicken. Op. cit. S. 278-287.
 Analiz sootnosheniya ponyatij auspicium i potestas sm. Catalano. Op. cit. P. 444-449.
 Cic. Ad Att. IV. 2. 4; Ad Q. fr. II. 1. 2 (sr. Har. Resp. 13); Ad fam. VIII. 4. 4 (Caelius); Phil. V. 35; VI. 8; Sallust. Cat. 50. 4; Gell. IV. 10. 2; App. BC. II. 5. Podrobnee sm. Mommsen. Op. cit. Bd III. 2. Lpz, 1888. S. 972-974; O'Brien Moore. Senatus//RE. Supplbd 6. 1935. Sp. 712; Rilinger. Op. cit. S. 42.
 Liv. XXI. 63. 1 (cf. 13, 15); Cic. II Verr. I. 109 (cf. 105); Dio Cass. XL. 66. 2-3.
 Liv. XXVII. 36. 10; XXXVIII. 42. 6; XLIV. 17. 7; Cic. I Verr. 21; II Verr. III. 222.
 Liv. XXXIX. 39. 9:... ubi designatus praetor esset, extemplo aedilitate se abdicaturum. Ehto zayavil Kv. Ful'vij Flakk, aedilis curulis designatus (ibid. 2, 6), dobivayas' izbraniya na neozhidanno osvobodivsheesya pretorskoe mesto. Syuda zhe mozhet otnosit'sya i rassmotrennyj vyshe sluchaj s abdikatsiej Martsella (is se magistratu abdicavit: Liv. XXIII. 31. 14), esli, konechno, on ne uspel do nee vstupit' v dolzhnost'.
 CIL. I2. P. 23 (539 a.u.c.). O ego gibeli sm. Liv. XXIII. 24. 6-12; CIL. I2. P. 23. Sm. Mommsen. Op. cit. Bd I. S. 590. Anm. 5; S. 591. Anm. 2. O dvukh podobnykh sluchayakh v I v. do n.eh. sm. ibid. S. 590. Anm. 6; S. 591. Anm. 1.
 Dio Cass. XL. 30. 1; 46. 2; 56. 1. Analiz sm. Mommsen. Op. cit. Bd II. S. 241-242.
 Villems P. Rimskoe gosudarstvennoe pravo/Per. s frants. Vyp. I. Kiev, 1888. S. 281. Prim. 2;
 Herzog. Op. cit. Bd 1. S. 617;
 Mommsen. Op. cit. Bd I. S. 613;
 Liebenam W. Curiata lex//RE. Bd 4. 1901. Sp. 1828;
 Catalano. Op. cit. P. 473
 Lange. Römische Alterthümer. Bd 1. S. 755;
 Mommsen. Op. cit. Bd II. S. 155-156;
 Liebenam W. Dictator//RE. Bd 5. 1905. Sp. 383;
 Netushil I.V. Ocherk rimskikh gosudarstvennykh drevnostej. Vyp. I. Khar'kov, 1894. S. 162;
 Dement'eva. Magistratura diktatora... S. 90;
 Tokmakov V.N. Sakral'nye aspekty voinskoj distsipliny v Rime Rannej Respubliki//VDI. 1997. № 2. S. 47.
 Smorchkov A.M. Regnum et sacrum: k voprosu o kharaktere tsarskoj vlasti v drevnem Rime//IVS ANTIQVVM. Drevnee pravo. 2002. № 2 (10). S. 39-40.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate