Везде
Postindustrial Civilization Transit: Institutional Aspect
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Postindustrial Civilization Transit: Institutional Aspect
Annotation
PII
S086904990008512-5-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Yuliy A. Nisnevich 
Occupation: Professor, Department of political science, national research University Higher school of Economics”
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Moscow, Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Issue 1
Pages
77-88
Abstract

The paper is devoted to the study of an institutional aspect of postindustrial civilizational transit  the process of transition from an industrial civilization to a new stage of civilizational development. It demonstrates that the increasing dynamic of postindustrial transformations does not fit into the static model of civilizational development as a gradual transition to a new stage of social development. Postindustrial transit is a dynamic process of formation of the civilizational development corridor. The state's development trajectory is located in this corridor, if it is located within the bounded boundaries that form the flexible corridor cover. The author describes a system of such boundaries. It includes the value-legal, political-administrative, socio-economic and information-communication components. The trajectories of democratic states’ transit form a united stream in the corridor of postindustrial civilizational development. Different states move at different speeds within this steam depending on the quality of democracy and efficiency of state order implementation. Development pathways of various authoritarian states are outside this corridor because of their inconsistency with the value-legal and political-administrative components

Keywords
Civilization, postindustrial development, transit, corridor of civilization development, political regime
Received
01.03.2020
Date of publication
02.03.2020
Number of purchasers
41
Views
2013
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S086904990008512-5-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 16.02.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Alekseev S.S. (2000) Pravo na poroge novogo tysiacheletiya [The law on the threshold of a new millennium]. Moscow: Statut.

2. Bol'shoy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' [The Great Encyclopedic Dictionary] (2004) Moscow: Norint.

3. Borokh O., Lomanov A. (2018) Novaia epokha Kitaia: ot obogashcheniya k usileniyu [The new era of China: from enrichment to reinforcement]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, no. 3, pp.59?70.

4. Braudel F. (1980) On History. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.

5. Brzezinski Zb. (2006) Vybor. Mirovoye gospodstvo ili global'noye liderstvo [The choice. Global domination or global leadership]. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia.

6. Campbell K.M., Ratner E. (2018) The China Reckoning. How Beijing Defined American Expectations. Foreign Affairs. (https://www.foreignaffairs. com/articles/united-states/2018-02-13/china-reckoning).

7. Carothers T. (2003) Konets paradigmy tranzita [The End of the Transit Paradigm]. Politicheskaya nauka, no. 2, pp. 42?65.

8. Castells M. (2000) Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika, obshchestvo i kul'tura [Information Age: Economics, Society and Culture]. Moscow: GU VShE.

9. Dahl R. (2000) O demokratii [On Democracy]. Moscow: Aspekt Press.

10. Fukuyama F. (2007) Konets istorii i posledniy chelovek [The End of History and the Last Man]. Moscow: AST.

11. Gaman-Golutvina O.V. (2007) Menyayushchayasya rol' gosudarstva v kontekste reform gosudarstvennogo upravleniya: otechestvennyi i zarubezhnyi opyt [The Changing Role of the State in the Context of Public Administration Reforms: Domestic and Foreign Experience]. POLIS. no. 4, pp. 24?45.

12. Held D., McGrew A., Goldblatt D., Perraton J. (2004) Global'nye transformatsii: Politika, ekonomika, kul'tura [Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture]. Moscow: Praksis.

13. Khoros V.G., Rashkovskii E.B. (2005) Mirovye tsivilizatsii i sovremennost' [The world civilizations and contemporaneity] Indiiskaia tsivilizatsiia v globaliziruiushchemsia mire [The indian civilization in a globalizing world] / Po materialam mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii ?Materials of the international conference?. Chief eds. S.I. Lunev, V.G.Khoros. Moscow: IMEMO RAN.

14. Kochetkova L. N. (2008) Teoriya sotsial'nogo gosudarstva Lorentsa fon Shteyna [The Theory of the Social State of Lorenz von Stein] Filosofiya i obshestvo, no. 3, pp. 69–79.

15. Lomanov A.V. (2015) Obshchii znamenatel' natsii [The common denominator of the nation] Rossiya v global’noy politike, no. 5, pp. 138?152.

16. Nersesyants V. S. (1983) Pravo i zakon. Iz istorii pravovykh ucheniy [Law and Law. From the History of Legal Doctrines]. Moscow: Nauka.

17. Nisnevich Yu. (2002) Rossiyskiy tranzit [Russian Transit] Postzapadnaya tsivilizatsiya. Liberalizm: proshloe, nastoyashchee i budushchee [Post-West Civilization. Liberalism: Past, Present and Future] Chief ed. S.Yushenkov. Moscow: Novyi faktor, Minuvshee, pp. 247?260.

18. Nisnevich Yu.A. (2017) Sovremennyi avtoritarizm i korruptsiya [Modern Authoritarianism and Corruption]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodniye otnosheniya, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 108?120. DOI:10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-1-108-120

19. Toffler A. (2004) Tret'ya volna [The Third Wave]. Moscow: AST.

20. Tsivilizatsionnye issledovaniya Sbornik statey pod red. B.I. Kovalya (1996) [The civilizational research Collection of articles. Ed. B.I.Koval]. Moscow: Institut Latinskoy Ameriki RAN.

21. White Leslie A. (1949) The Science of Culture. A Study of Man and Civilization. New York: Grove Press.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate