RAS Social ScienceСоциологические исследования Sotsialogicheski issledovania

  • ISSN (Print) 0132-1625
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-6010

Anthropology beyond Human: Post-Humanistic Influences [Antropologiia za predelami chelovecheskogo: postgumanisticheskie vliianiia]

PII
S086954150013590-9-
DOI
10.31857/S086954150013590-9
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / №1
Pages
5-12
Abstract

Introducing a special theme of the issue on “Animal Turn in Anthropology”, the article presents a spectrum of posthumanist trends in contemporary humanities such as eco-criticism, animal history, animal geography, animal studies, anthropology of non-human subjects, or multi-species ethnography. Their appearance is associated with the growing influence of the achievements of the biological sciences in the humanities, as well as with the growing environmental crisis. The inseparability of humans (and their activities) from the rest of the living and inanimate world is emphasized by the concept of the Anthropocene – the geological era in which the Earth is now. Human, who until recently was considered as belonging to a separate and the highest category, begins to be considered in the humanities as one of many species, and human culture as a product of evolution. At the same time, other living beings are increasingly studied like human communities, and researchers recognize their agency and subjectivity. The thematic section features contributions by Anastasiia Lokteva, Magdalena Kozhevnikova, Kirill Rossiianov, Oxana Timofeeva, and Gabriela Jarzebowska.

Keywords
cultural anthropology, animal turn, posthumanism, animal studies, non-human subjects, nonhuman animals
Date of publication
25.02.2021
Year of publication
2021
Number of purchasers
23
Views
591

References

  1. 1. Bakke, M. 2011. Studia nad zwierzętami: od aktywizmu do akademii i z powrotem? [Animal Studies: From Activism to Academia and Back Again?]. Teksty Drugie 3: 193–204.
  2. 2. Bakke, M. 2020. Gdy stawka jest większa niż życie. Sztuka wobec mineralno-biologicznych wspólnot [When the Stake Is Greater than Life: Art in Regard to Mineral-Biological Communities]. Teksty Drugie 1: 165–185.
  3. 3. Bogusławski, M.M. 2019. Posthumanizm jako ideologia i perspektywa badawcza [Posthumanism as an Ideology and Research Perspective]. Hybris 46: 1–39.
  4. 4. Collard, R.-C., and K. Gillespie, eds. 2015. Critical Animal Geographies: Politics, Intersections, and Hierarchies in a Multispecies World. New York: Routledge.
  5. 5. Dooren van, Th., E. Kirksey, and U. Münster. 2016. Multispecies Studies: Cultivating Arts of Attentiveness. Environmental Humanities 8 (1): 1–23.
  6. 6. Selosse, M.-A. 2019. Nigdy osobno [Never Alone]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
  7. 7. Smart, A. 2014. Critical Perspectives on Multispecies Ethnography. Critique of Anthropology 34 (I): 3–7.
  8. 8. Weil, K. 2014. Zwrot ku zwierzętom. Sprawozdanie [Animal Turn: Report]. In Zwierzęta, gender i kultura: Perspektywa ekologiczna, etyczna i krytyczna [Animals, Gender and Culture: Ecological, Ethical and Critical Perspective], edited by A. Barcz and M. Dąbrowska, 15–36. Lublin: E-naukowiec.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library