Везде
Law as linguistic phenomenon
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Law as linguistic phenomenon
Annotation
PII
S1026-94520000487-3-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Viktor N. Kornev 
Edition
Issue 6
Pages
5-12
Abstract

The topic "law and language" is the key one in legal science and practice. Law finds its expression in the language. Making the language of normative and individual legal acts perfect from the point of view of legal technology is one of the most important tasks in modern legal science. However, a linguistic approach does not solve other important problems in the area of rights - language correlation. The author of the article explores the topic in the context of the theory and philosophy of language, which is the premise for the grounding of the concept of law as a language phenomenon. On the basis of this methodological approach, the author comes to the conclusion that law as a language phenomenon is able to perform its specific functions. Among them, the author pays special attention to the communicative function, which is typical for both the texts of normative legal acts and legal acts of an individual character. In order to fulfill the regulatory function, the law should be brought to the attention of an indefinite number of persons with the help of the language...

Keywords
law, principle of law, language of law, legal text, communication, intention, suggestion, signification, meaning in law, legal language game, application of law, lawmaking, phenomenology
Date of publication
01.06.2018
Number of purchasers
8
Views
1598
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S1026-94520000487-3-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 20.10.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Lazarev V.V. Dialektika ob'ektivnogo i sub'ektivnogo v interpretatsionnykh aktakh suda // Zhurnal ross. prava. 2017. № 9 (249). S. 97-108 
 
 2. Cherdantsev A.F. Logiko-yazykovye fenomeny v yurisprudentsii. M., 2012 
 
 3. Vlasenko N.A. Izbrannoe. M., 2015; Polyakov A.V. Obschaya teoriya prava. Problemy interpretatsii v kontekste kommunikativnogo podkhoda: ucheb. SPb., 2004 
 
 4. Khuk M. van. Pravo kak kommunikatsiya. SPb., 2012 
 
 5. Lampe E. Juristisch Semantik. Hamburg-Berlin-Zurich, 1970 
 
 6. MullerF., WimmerR. (Hrsg.). Neue Studienzur Rechtslinguistik. Berlin, 2001; i dr 
 
 7. Dement'eva T.M. Lingvisticheskie osobennosti nemetskogo yazyka prava // Filologicheskie nauki: voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2009. № 2 (9). S. 207 
 
 8. Gegel'. Filosofiya prava. M., 1990. S. 247. 
 
 9. Gegel'. Nauka logiki. 2-e izd., ster. M., 2005. S. 482. 
 
 10. Heidegger M. Brief uber den "Humanismus" // Platos Lehre von der Wahrheit. Mi teinem Brief uber den Humanismus. Bern, 1947. S. 53-119. 
 
 11. Sm.: Busse D. Juristische Semantik. Berlin, 1993. S. 11. 
 
 12. Kelsen H. Allgemeine Teorie der Normen. Wien, 1979. S. 21. 
 
 13. Nawiasky H. Allgemeine Rechtslehre als System der rechtlichen Grundbegriffe. Zurich / Koln, 1948. S. 11. 
 
 14. Rutters B., Fischer Ch., Birk A. Rechtstheorie mit Juristischer Methodenlehre. 9. Auflage. Munchen, 2016. S. 59. 
 
 15. Lotman Yu. Vnutri myslyaschikh mirov. M., 2016. S. 6. 
 
 16. Sm.: tam zhe. S. 17. 
 
 17. Sm.: Rutters B., Fischer Ch., Birk A. Op. cit. S. 104. 
 
 18. Lejst O.Eh. Suschnost' prava. Problemy teorii i filosofii prava. M., 2002. S. 265. 
 
 19. Fuko M. Volya k istine: po tu storonu znaniya, vlasti i seksual'nosti. Raboty raznykh let / per. s fr. M., 1996. S. 190. 
 
 20. Cherepanova I.Yu. Dom koldun'i. Suggestivnaya lingvistika. M., 1996. S. 26; 
 
 21. Zvegintsev V.A. K voprosu o prirode yazyka // Voprosy filosofii. 1979. № 11. S. 67-78 
 
 22. Sm.: Cherepanova I.Yu. Ukaz.soch. S. 27. 
 
 23. Gusserl' Eh. Idei k chistoj fenomenologii i fenomenologicheskoj filosofii. M., 2006. S. 262, 270. 
 
 24. Sm.:. Legal theory/edited by Peter Wahlgren. Stockholm, 2000. P. 181-189. 
 
 25. Sm.: Sadowski-Zirk M. Wprowadzenie do filozofii prawa. Warszawa, 2012. S. 78. 
 
 26. Tsit. po: Buss D. Op. cit. S. 10. 
 
 27. Vas'kovskij E.V. Tsivilisticheskaya metodologiya. Uchenie o tolkovanii i primenenii grazhdanskikh zakonov. M., 2002. S. 100, 101. 
 
 28. Sm.: Rutters B., Fischer Ch., Birk A. Op. cit. S. 107. 
 
 29. Vitgenshtejn L. Filosofskie issledovaniya (№ 23) // Yazyki kak obraz mira. M., SPb., 2003. S. 236, 237 
 
 30. Frege G. Logische Untersuhungen. Gottingen, 1993. S. 50 
 
 31. Vitgenshtejn L. Filosofskie issledovaniya (№ 43) // Yazyki kak obraz mira. M., SPb., 2003. S. 250. 
 
 32. Vitgenshtejn L. Golubaya i korichnevye knigi: predvaritel'nye materialy k "Filosofskim issledovaniyam" / per. s angl. Novosibirsk, 2008. S. 122.
 
 33. Sm.: Vitgenshtejn L. Filosofskie issledovaniya (№ 23) // Yazyki kak obraz mira. S. 237. 
 
 34. Sm.: NiggiA.M., Keshelawa T. Recht und Wittgenstein VI: Vertikale Normendhrchdrinngung der anderen Art // in: S. H./K. Mathis (hrsg.): Recht, Moral und Faktizitet. Festschrift fur Walter Ott. Zurich, 2008. S. 133-151. 
 
 35. Sm.; Vitgenshtejn L. Filosofskie issledovaniya (№ 14) i sled. // Yazyki kak obraz mira. S. 230. 
 
 36. Rutters B. Rechtstheorie. Munchen, 1999. S. 95. 
 
 37. Sm.: ibid. S. 97. 
 
 38. Vitgenshtejn L. Filosofskie issledovaniya (№ 242) // Yazyki kak obraz mira. S. 346. 
 
 39. Betti Eh. Germenevtika kak obschaya metodologiya nauk o dukhe / Per. s nem. M., 2011. S. 29. 
 
 40. Busse D. Op. cit. S. 12. 
 
 41. Sm.: Ehko U. Otsutstvuyuschaya struktura. Vvedenie v semiologiyu / per. s ital. M., 2006. S. 65 
 
 42. Tazetdinova R.R. K voprosu o germenevtike terminov "oznachaemoe" i "oznachayuschee" // Vestnik OGU. № 5 (86). S. 38-41. 
 
 43. Sm.; Tazetdinova R.R. Ukaz. soch. S. 38. 
 
 44. Ehko U. Ukaz. soch. S. 72. 
 
 45. Vitgenshtejn L. Logiko-filosofskij traktat / Per. s angl. M., 2010. S. 62.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate