Везде
International legal regime of the Arctic (conceptual confrontation)
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
International legal regime of the Arctic (conceptual confrontation)
Annotation
PII
S1026-94520000488-4-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Victoria D. Gitsu  Margarita A. Gitsu
Edition
Issue 6
Pages
45-58
Abstract
The present article deals with the theoretical and practical aspects of the interstate delimitation of Arctic areas: with the key concepts of the doctrine of international law; international law positions of the Arctic countries; conceptual approaches of the prominent representatives of the Russian science and practice of international law. Guided by the theory and practice of international law, the authors come to the conclusion of unacceptability of the sectoral theory. Challenging the norm-setting nature of the theory of the "polar sectors", the authors prove that an international legal custom has developed in the Arctic region, but it has a different content. Тhe foreground basis for the polar delimitation is the international legal custom of recognizing the historical title as legal grounds for the preferential rights of the polar states in the Arctic region, the substantiality and significance of which have been proven by their continued implementation.
Keywords
legal regime, legal status, Arctic states, polar sector, sectoral principle, theory of internationalization, theory of condominium, delimitation, continental shelf, international legal custom, meridian line method, limited jurisdiction
Date of publication
01.06.2018
Number of purchasers
8
Views
1963
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S1026-94520000488-4-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 20.10.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. SZ SSSR 1926. № 32, st. 203. 
 
 2. Durdenevskij V.N. Problema pravovogo rezhima pripolyarnykh oblastej//Vestnik MGU. Ser. "Obschestvennye nauki". 1950. № 7. S. 113. 
 
 3. Miller D.H. Political rights in the Arctic//Foreign Affairs. 1925. 4(1). R. 54. 
 
 4. Tsit po: Korovin E. SSSR i polyarnye zemli // Sov. pravo. 1926. № 1. S. 45. 
 
 5. Kopylov M.N. O pravovom rezhime Arktiki//Pravovaya initsiativa. 2013. № 12. 
 
 6. Gudev P.A. Arktika kak "globalcommons"?//Puti k miru i bezopasnosti. 2016. № 1(50). S. 55, 56. 
 
 7. Arktika: interesy Rossii i mezhdunarodnye usloviya ikh realizatsii/Barsegov Yu.G., Korzun V.A., Mogilyov-kin I.M. i dr. M., 2002. URL: http://www.somegeography.ru/somems-639-1.html 
 
 8. URL: http://tass.ru/info/895685 
 
 9. Kazmin Yu. K voprosu o vneshnej granitse kontinental'nogo shel'fa Rossii v Arktike//Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'. 2010. № 3. S. 21. 
 
 10. Vylegzhanin A.N. Arkticheskij shel'f: posledstviya izmeneniya v 1997 godu mezhdunarodno-pravovoj pozitsii Rossii. M., 2016 -Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://mgimo.ru/about/news/experts/arkticheskiy-shelf/ 
 
 11. Melkov G.M. K voprosu o statuse Pechorskogo i Okhotskogo morej//Moskovskij zhurnal mezhdunar. prava. 2014. № 4. S. 44. 
 
 12. Vylegzhanin A.N. Ukaz. soch. 
 
 13. Zhudro I.S. Mezhdunarodno-pravovoj rezhim dna Severnogo Ledovitogo okeana. Problemy razgranicheniya//Vestnik SPbU. Ser. 14. 2014. № 4. S. 8, 9, 13. 
 
 14. Vylegzhanin A.N. Ukaz. soch. 
 
 15. Vylegzhanin A.N. K utochneniyu pravovogo polozheniya dna Severnogo Ledovitogo okeana. URL: http://www.morvesti.ru/tems/detail.php? ID=58758 
 
 16. Arktika: interesy Rossii i mezhdunarodnye usloviya ikh realizatsii/otv. red. I.M. Mogilevkin. M., 2002. S. 24. 
 
 17. Soglashenie mezhdu SSSR i SShA o linii razgranicheniya morskikh prostranstv 1990 g. do sikh por ne ratifitsirovano Rossiej//Byulleten' mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov. 2008. № 1. S. 33-37. 
 
 18. Get'man-Pavlova I.V. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo kak regulyator sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenij. M., 2004. S. 409. 
 
 
 19. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: ucheb./pod red. G.I. Tunkina. M., 1994. S. 380. 
 
 20. Biryukov P.N. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. M., 2006. S. 182, 183; 
 
 21. Kolodkin A.L., Gutsulyak V.N., Bobrova Yu.V. Mirovoj okean. Mezhdunarodno-pravovoj rezhim. Osnovnye problemy. M., 2007. S. 259. 
 
 22. Brounli Ya. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Kn. 1. M., 1977. S. 237. 
 
 23. Pharand D. Canada's Arctic waters in International Law. Cambridge, 1988. P. 26, 43, 79. 
 
 24. Vylegzhanin A.N. Soglashenie mezhdu SSSR i SShA o linii razgranicheniya morskikh prostranstv 1990 goda: raznye otsenki "vremennogo primeneniya". URL: http://old.mgimo. ru/news/experts/document124210.phtml 
 
 25. Sb. pogranichnykh dogovorov, zaklyuchennykh Rossiej s sosednimi gosudarstvami. SPb., 1891. S. 299-303. 
 
 26. Arkticheskij region. Problemy mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva: khrestomatiya: v 3 t. T. 3. M., 2013. S. 73. 
 
 27. Hayton. T1yu "Amerian" Antarctic // American Journal International Law. Vol. 50. 1956. P. 603-607. 
 
 28. Kolombos D. Mezhdunarodnoe morskoe pravo. M., 1975. S. 121. 
 
 29. Khajd Ch. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo, ego ponimanie i primenenie Soedinennymi Shtatami Ameriki/per. s angl. M., 1951. S. 60. 
 
 30. Titushkin V.Yu. K voprosu o vneshnikh granitsakh kontinental'nogo shel'fa Rossijskoj Federatsii v Arktike//Mezhdunarodnoe morskoe pravo. Stat'i pamyati A.L. Kolodkina. M., 2014. S. 245. 
 
 31. Gavrilov V.V. Pravovye problemy opredeleniya granits kontinental'nogo shel'fa v Arktike//Evrazijskij yurid. zhurnal. 2016. № 7. S. 14. 
 
 32. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: ucheb./otv. red. V.P. Kuznetsov, B.R. Tuzmukhamedov. M., 2007. S. 121. 
 
 33. Tunkin G.I. Teoriya mezhdunarodnogo prava. M., 1970. S. 131. 
 
 34. tam zhe. S. 135. 
 
 35. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: ucheb./otv. red. V.I. Kuznetsov, B.R. Tuzmukhamedov. S. 113. 
 
 36. Timtchenko L. The Russian Arctic Sectoral Concept: Past apL Present. R. 30, 31. 
 
 37. Korovin E. Ukaz. soch. S. 46. 
 
 38. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: ucheb./otv. red. Yu.M. Kolosov, V.I. Kuznetsov. M., 1998. S. 506. 
 
 39. URL: http://modern lib.ru/books/va_belli/voenno-morskoy_mezhdunarodno-pravovoy_spravochnik_kniga_2/ 
 
 40. Butler W.E. Northeast Arctic Passage (Alphen ann den Rijn, 1978). P. 77. 
 
 41. Rothwell D.R. The Polar Regions and the Development of International Law. London, 1966. R. 173. 
 
 42. Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe pravo. S. 573. 
 
 43. Titushkin V.Yu. Ukaz. soch. S. 245. 
 
 44. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo/otv. red. Yu.M. Kolosov, Eh.S. Krivchikova. M., 2005. S. 149. 
 
 45. Vylegzhanin A.N. K utochneniyu pravovogo polozheniya dna Severnogo Ledovitogo okeana. 
 
 46. Rothwell D.R., Joyner G.G. The Polar Oceans and the Law of the Sea/The Law of the Sea and Polar Maritime Delimitation and Jurisdiction/ed. by A.G. Oude Elferink and D.R. Rothwell. New Jork -London, 2001. P. 1. 
 
 47. Byers M. International Law and Arctic. N.Y., 2013. R. 59. 
 
 48. Gubanov A.I. Razgranichenie kontinental'nogo shel'fa v Arktike: mezhdunarodno-pravovye problemy i perspektivy. M., 2015. S. 164; Gavrilov V.V. Ukaz. soch. S. 14; Mezhdunarodno-politicheskie usloviya razvitiya Arkticheskoj zony Rossijskoj Federatsii/pod red. A.V. Zagorskogo. M., 2015. S. 51. 
 
 49. Dufresne R. Canadas Legal Claims Over Arctic Territory and Waters//Parliamentary Information and Research Service 6 December 2007. PRB 07-39 E. P. 5, 6. 
 
 50. Korovin E. Ukaz. soch. S. 44. 
 
 51. President Truman Proclamation 2667 of September 28, 1945 "Policy of the United States With Respect to the Natural Resources of the Subsoil and Sea Bed of the Continental Shelf". URL: http://www.oceancommission.gov/documents/gov_ oceans/truman.pdfiro 
 
 52. Korovin E. Ukaz. soch. S. 44. 
 
 53. Ferdross A. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo/per.s nem. M., 1959. S. 255, 256 
 
 54. Korovin E. Ukaz. soch. S. 43 
 
 55. Maleev Yu.N. Kontinental'nyj shel'f Rossii v Arktike: upravlenie i ispol'zovanie bez bor'by//Mezhdunarodnoe pravo/International Law. 1(37) 2009. S. 120 
 
 56. Voj-tolovskij G.K. Nereshennye problemy Arkticheskogo more-pol'zovaniya // Vestnik MGTU. T. 13. 2010. № 1. S. 92 
 
 57. Sokirkin V.A. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye problemy pravovogo polozheniya arkticheskikh prolivov (Na primere Severo-Zapadnogo prokhoda): dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2004. S. 9, 10 
 
 58. Tunkin G.I. Ukaz. soch. S. 130. 
 
 59. Vylegzhanin A.N. Nauchno-ehkspertnyj memorandum «O vozmozhnosti sokhraneniya v kachestve kontinental'nogo shel'fa Rossii rajona "A" v predelakh rossijskogo arkticheskogo sektora, utrachivaemogo soglasno predstavleniyu ("zayavke") Rossii 2001 g.». M., 2001. S. 9. 
 
 60. Kazmin Yu. K voprosu o vneshnej granitse kontinental'nogo shel'fa Rossii v Arktike//Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'. 2019. № 3. S. 21. 
 
 61. tam zhe. S. 33. 
 
 62. National Strategy for the Arctic Region. Washington, 2013. 9-10; National Security Presidential Directive and Homeland Security Presidential Directive, January 9, 2009 -Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://georgewbush-whitehouse. archives.gov/news/releases/2009/01/20090112-3.html 
 
 63. Poval L.M. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye problemy razdela ehkonomicheskikh prostranstv Arktiki//Arktika i Sever. 2011. № 3. URL: http://www.norge.ru/artcitclov 
 
 64. Sokolova E.L. Institut istoricheskikh vod v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave. URL: http://mgimo.ru/files2/y12_2014/262261/sokolova_diss.pdf 
 
 65. Istoriya osvoeniya Arktiki. URL://http://library.narfu. ru/sites/arctic/rus/info/history/Pages/istoria_osvoenia_arktiki.aspx 
 
 66. Sm.: Ovlaschenko A.V., Pokrovskij I.F. Problemy pravovogo rezhima Severnogo morskogo puti (k provedeniyu Mezhdunarodnogo polyarnogo goda 2007-2008 gg.) // Transportnoe pravo. 2007. № 2. S. 21. 
 
 67. Poval L.M. Ukaz. soch. 
 
 68. Istoriya Arktiki. URL: http://www.arctic-info.ru/encyclopedia/arctic-history/ 
 
 69. Sm.: Rothwell D.R. The Canadian-U.S. Northwest Passage Dispute: A Reassessment // Cornell International Law Journal. Vol. 26, Issue 2 Spring 1993. R. 333. 
 
 70. Konventsiyu OON po morskomu pravu 1982 g. ratifitsirovali 159 stran i Evropejskij Soyuz. 
 
 71. Matt McGrath. China joins Arctic Council but a decision on the EU is deferred // BBC News 15 May 2013. http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-22527822; Buixade Farre A. et al. Commercial Arctic shipping throughthe Northeast Passage: routes, resources, governance, technology, and infrastructure // Polar Geography. Vol. 37. 2014. No. 4. R. 306. 
 
 72. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye osnovy nedropol'zovaniya: ucheb. posobie/otv. red. A.N. Vylegzhanin. M., 2007. S. 140. 
 73. Maleev Yu.N. Ukaz. soch. S. 119, 120. 
 
 74. Gudev P.A. Ukaz. soch. S. 55. 
 
 75. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: ucheb./otv. red. Yu.M. Kolosov, Eh.S. Krivchikova. S. 149. 
 
 76. Maleev Yu.N. Ukaz. soch. S. 122-125. Ramki nastoyaschej stat'i ne pozvolyayut ostanovit'sya na rassmotrenii vsekh vyskazyvaemykh predlozhenij. 
 
 77. Rothwell D.R. The Arctic in International Affairs: Time for a New Regime? URL: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/228219308 
 
 78. Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe pravo: ucheb./pod red. K.A. Bekyasheva. M., 2008. S. 574, 575.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate