Везде
Pravozashchitnaia funktsiia suda i sudebnoe pravotvorchestvo v Rossii
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Pravozashchitnaia funktsiia suda i sudebnoe pravotvorchestvo v Rossii
Annotation
PII
S1026-94520000616-5-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Valerij Grebennikov 
Edition
Issue 8
Pages
5-11
Abstract
human rights function of the court (and judiciary in General) in Russia define the legal nature of the judiciary and the essence of judicial activity, whose main goal – legal protection of violated rights and freedoms, restore the keyboard accepted by the court on the basis used (interpreted) by the judge of the law using the analogy of law or analogy of law. Taken in this way, the court decision resulting from implementation of the remedial function of the court, cannot be equated with lawmaking, at least because such an understanding would violate the constitutional principle of separation of powers.
Keywords
court, judicial law making, human rights, analogy of law, analogy of law, judicial system, justice
Date of publication
01.08.2017
Number of purchasers
4
Views
1400
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S1026-94520000616-5-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 24.10.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Sm.: Otkuda poshel russkij sud // Ross. yustitsiya. 2003.№ 1. S. 6. 
 
 2. Deutsche Landesberichte zum X Internationalen Kongress fiir Rechtsvergleichung. Sektionen I/VI/VII, Heidelberg, 1978. S. 120. 
 
 3. Franke-Griecksch G. La position et les devoirs du juge dans RFD // Revue inter-nationale de droit penal. 1975. № 1-2. P. 101. 
 
 4. Podrobnee sm.: Marchuk V. P. "Svobodnoe pravo" v burzhuaznoj yurisprudentsii. Kiev, 1977. 
 
 5. Sm. ob ehtom: Kiselev I. Ya. Trudovye konflikty v kapitalisticheskom obschestve. M., 1978. S. 156. 
 
 6. Ipsen J. Richterrect und Verfassung. Mhnchen, 1975. S. 27, 28. 
 
 7. Marcic R. Vom Gesetzesstaat zum Ricliterstaat. Wien, 1957. Kritika ehtoj knigi s marksistskikh pozitsij byla srazu zhe dana vidnym avstrijskim yuristom Eh. Rabofskim (sm.: Das Recht der Arbeit. 1958. № 2. S. 53-57) (tsit. po Rabofskomu). 
 
 8. Podrobnee sm.: Sudebnaya praktika v sovetskoj pravovoj sisteme / Pod red. S. N. Bratusya. M., 1975. S. 11. 
 
 9. Sm.: Komissarov K. I. Zadachi sudebnogo nadzora v sfere grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva. Sverdlovsk, 1971. S. 23 i sled. 
 
 10. Heydte F. u.d. Naturrecht, Richterrecht, Gesetzesrecht // Dimensionen des Recht. V. I. 1974. S. 96. 
 
 11. Sm., naprimer: David R. Les grands systemes de droit contemporains. 7 ed. Paris, 1978. P. 132-147. 
 
 12. Johnson E. Lawyers' Choice: A Theoretical Appraisal of Litigation Investment Decisions // Law & Society Review. Vol. 15. N 3/4. Special Issue on Dispute Processing and Civil Litigation (1980-1981). R. 567-610. 
 
 13. Klassicheskaya rabota P. Ewick, S. Silbey (The Common Place of Law. Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago and London, 1998) razbiraet pravovoe povedenie grazhdan v zavisimosti ot togo, kakoj opyt oni imeli ranee. 
 
 14. Pervyj sud // Ross. yustitsiya. 2005. № 3 
 
 15. Mal'tsev G. V. Mest' i vozmezdie v drevnem prave. M., 2012 
 
 16. Pozdnyakov M. Sudebnaya reforma: patsient skoree zhiv, chem mertv? // Advokat. 2006. № 12. S. 28-34 
 
 17. Alimbekov M. T. Sudebnoe pravotvorchestvo i primenenie grazhdansko-pravovykh norm v mekhanizme pravoreali-zatsii. Diss.... doktora yurid. nauk. Almaty, 2010 
 
 18. Tumanov V. A. Ukaz. soch 
 
 19. Tumanov V. A. K kritike kontseptsii "sudejskogo prava" // Sov. gos. i pravo. 1980. № 3. S. 111-118

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate