Везде

RAS Social ScienceСоциологические исследования Sotsialogicheski issledovania

  • ISSN (Print) 0132-1625
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-6010

Green New Deal of the USA and Canada in 2021

You can
PII
S207054760019832-2-
DOI
10.18254/S207054760019832-2
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Ilya sokov
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue 2
Pages
0
Abstract

The article examines the issues of joint participation of the USA and Canada in the fight against global climate change after the Paris Agreement's adoption in 2015. There are analyzes the features of the American and Canadian approaches to the implementation of the "Green New Deal", changes in the "Green industrial policy" and infrastructure restructuring in these North American societies. The author of the article notes the existing opportunities and obstacles in achieving the planned goals to the climate transition  by 2030 and it is also concluded that insufficient scientific and technological elaboration and clarity in the possibility of 100 percent decarburization when switching only to renewable energy do not allow us to consider this goal achievable by 2050.

Keywords
the United States. Canada, Green New Deal, Green Industrial Policy, Pact for a Green New Deal, Renewable energy, the Paris Climate Accords, Build Back Better plan
Date of publication
22.04.2022
Year of publication
2022
Number of purchasers
11
Views
1040

References

  1. 1. Ocasio-Cortez, A. Recognizing the Duty of the Federal Government to Create a Green New Deal. H.Res.109—116th Congress (2019–2020) 12.02.2019. Available at: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/ (accessed 20.01.2022).
  2. 2. Biden for President. Plan for Climate Change and Environmental Justice. 14.07.2020. Available at: https://joebiden.com/climate-plan/ (accessed 20.01.2022).
  3. 3. Leaders Summit on Climate. Available at: https://www.state.gov/leaders-summit-on-climate/ (accessed 20.01.2022).
  4. 4. Leaders Summit on Climate. Available at: https://www.state.gov/leaders-summit-on-climate/day-1/ (accessed 20.01.2022).
  5. 5. Pursuing the Climate Crisis Agenda – 2022. Staff Report. Renewable Resources Journal. 2022, Vol. 36, No. 4, P.2.
  6. 6. Leaders Summit on Climate. Available at: https://www.commerce.gov/news/blog/2021/04/us-commerce-secretary-gina-raimondo-addresses-clean-energy-economy-and-importance (accessed 21.01.2022).
  7. 7. Le Pacte, Le Pacte Pour La transition, (2019). https://www.lepacte.ca/en/the- pact/ accessed September 19, 2019.
  8. 8. Coalition for a Green New Deal, Green New Deal, 2019. Available at: https://act.greennewdealcanada.ca/what-we-heard/ (accessed 21.01.2022)
  9. 9. Reich, R. Biden is poised to transform how America treats industry. He must follow through. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/apr/17/china-climate-pandemic-biden-us-industrial-policy (accessed 21.01.2022).
  10. 10. Ibid.
  11. 11. Ibid.
  12. 12. Bordoff, J. The Time for a Green Industrial Policy Is Now. Available at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/03/15/biden-climate-energy-transition-green-new-deal-industrial-policy/ (accessed 22.01.2022).
  13. 13. The Biden Plan for a Clean Energy Revolution and Environmental Justice. Available at: https://joebiden.com/climate-plan/ (accessed 22.01.2022).
  14. 14. Reash, R.J. Energy and the environment: Striking a balance. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 2021, Vol. 17, Issue 5, R. 899, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4477
  15. 15. Ish, J.C. A Road Map to Restoring Rivers: How the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement Might Influence Future Dam Removal and River Restoration Projects. Nature Resources Journal. 2020, Vol. 60, P. 263. Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol60/iss2/6/ (accessed 22.01.2022).
  16. 16. The Biden Plan for a Clean Energy Revolution and Environmental Justice. Available at: https://joebiden.com/climate-plan/ (accessed 22.01.2022).
  17. 17. Evans, J. The Green New Deal is the Democrats’ Ticket to a 2022 House Majority. Available at: https://theleaflet.org/home-1/green-new-deal (accessed 23.01.2022).
  18. 18. Ibid.
  19. 19. Symons, J. Biden's 2022 climate test. Available at: https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/588581-bidens-2022-climate-test (accessed 23.01.2022).
  20. 20. International Energy Agency, Special Report. Available at: https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/deebef5d-0c34-4539-9d0c-10b13d840027/NetZeroby2050-ARoadmapfortheGlobalEnergySector_CORR.pdf (accessed 23.01.2022).
  21. 21. Luhby,T., Lobosco, K. Biden's Build Back Better plan is on ice. Here's what that means for you Available at: https://edition.cnn.com/2021/12/20/politics/joe-biden-build-back-better-setback-explained/index.html (accessed 24.01.2022).
  22. 22. Build Back Better Act H.R.5376 - 117th Congress (2021-2022) Available at: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/5376 (accessed 24.01.2022).
  23. 23. Pramuk, J. Biden says he thinks Congress can pass parts of broken-up Build Back Better plan. Available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/19/joe-biden-thinks-congress-can-pass-part-of-build-back-better-act.html (accessed 24.01.2022).
  24. 24. Wyse, S.M., Hoicka, C.E. “By and for local people”: assessing the connection between local energy plans and community energy. Local Environment 2019, Vol. 24, Issue 9, P. 885. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2019.1652802
  25. 25. Carroll, W.K. Canada's Carbon - Capital Elite, A tangled web of corporate power. Canadian Journal of Sociology. 2017, Vol. 42, No. 3. P. 235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29173/cjs28258
  26. 26. Liggio, J., Li, S., Staebler, R.M., Hayden, K., Darlington, A., Mittermeier, R.L., Brien, J.O., Mclaren, R., Wolde, M., Worthy, D., Vogel, F. Measured Canadian oil sands CO2 emissions are higher than estimates made using internationally recommended methods, Nature Communications. 2019, Vol.10, No. 1. P. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09714-9
  27. 27. Burke, M.J., Stephens, J.C. Political power and renewable energy futures: a critical review. Energy Research & Social Science. 2018, Vol. 35, P. 78-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.018
  28. 28. Feldpausch-Parker, A.M., Endres, D., Peterson, T.R. Editorial: a research agenda for energy democracy, Frontiers in Communication. 2019, Vol.4, No. 53, P.1-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm. 2019.00053; Lennon, B., Dunphy, N.P., Sanvicente, E. Community acceptability and the energy transition: a citizens perspective, Energy, Sustainability and Society. 2019, Vol. 9, No. 35, P.1-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-19-0218-z
  29. 29. MacArthur, J.L. Hoicka, Ch.E., Castleden, H., Das, R., Lieue, J. et al. Canada's Green New Deal: Forging the socio-political foundations of climate resilient infrastructure? Energy Research & Social Science Vol., July, P.1-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101442
  30. 30. Bridge, G., Bouzarovski, S., Bradshaw, M., Eyre, N. Geographies of energy transition: space, place and the low-carbon economy, Energy Policy 2013, Vol. 53, P. 331-332, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.066
  31. 31. Stefanelli, R. D., Walker, Ch.D., Kornelsen, D., Lewis, D. et al. Renewable energy and energy autonomy: how Indigenous peoples in Canada are shaping an energy future, Environmental Reviews. 2018, Vol.27, P. 95-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2018-0024
  32. 32. Equal by 30: Balance Means Business. Available at: https://www.cleanenergyministerial.org/sites/default/files/2019-06/Equal%20by%2030%20Balance%20Means%20Business%20Report.pdf (accessed 25.01.2022).
  33. 33. Baker, K.J., Mould, R., Restrick, S. Rethink fuel poverty as a complex problem. Nature Energy. 2018. Vol.3, P. 610-612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0204-2
  34. 34. Tobin, P. Leaders and Laggards: Climate Policy Ambition in Developed States. Global Environmental Politics. 2017, Vol.17, No.4, P. 28–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00433
  35. 35. Oatley, T. Energy and the Complexity of International Order. Global Environmental Politics. 2021, Vol. 21, No. 4, P. 20–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00637
  36. 36. Duke, J., Watson, R., Knorr, W. Climate Scientists: Concept of Net Zero Is a Dangerous Trap. The Conversation, 22.04.2021. Available at: https://theconversation.com/amp/climate-scientists-concept-of-net-zero-is-a-dangerous-trap-157368 (accessed 25.01.2022).
  37. 37. Oatley, T. Energy and the Complexity of International Order. R.32. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00637
  38. 38. Fang, C.C. The case for environmental advocacy. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 2021, Vol. 11, R.169. DOI: https://doi.Org/10.1007/s13412-020-00650-5
  39. 39. Le Quéré, C., Jackson, R.B., Jones, M.W. et al. Temporary reduction in daily global CO2 emissions during the COVID-19 forced confinement. National Climate Change. 2020, Vol. 10, P. 647-653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0797-x
  40. 40. Epstein, K., Wood, D. J. A., Roemer, K., Currey, B., Duff, H., Gay, J. D., Goemann, H., Loewen, S., Milligan, M. C., Wendt, J. A. F., Brookshire, E. J., Maxwell, B. D., McNew, L., McWethy, D. B., Stoy, P.C., Haggerty, J. H. Toward an urgent yet deliberate conservation strategy: sustaining social-ecological systems in rangelands of the Northern Great Plains, Montana. Ecology and Society, 2021, Vol. 26, No.1, P. 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12141-260110
  41. 41. Reash, R.J. Energy and the environment: Striking a balance. P. 900.
  42. 42. The role of critical minerals in clean energy transitions. IEA. Flagship report — May 2021. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-critical-minerals-in-clean-energy-transitions (accessed 26.01.2022).
  43. 43. Oatley, T. Energy and the Complexity of International Order R.39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00637
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library