- Код статьи
- S207054760019832-2-
- DOI
- 10.18254/S207054760019832-2
- Тип публикации
- Статья
- Статус публикации
- Опубликовано
- Авторы
- Том/ Выпуск
- Том / Выпуск № 2
- Страницы
- 0
- Аннотация
В статье рассматриваются вопросы совместного участия США и Канады в борьбе с глобальным изменением климата после принятия Парижского соглашения по климату в 2015 г., анализируются особенности американского и канадского подходов в реализации «Зелёного нового курса», изменения «зелёной промышленной политики» и инфраструктурной перестройки в этих североамериканских обществах. Автором отмечаются существующие возможности и препятствия в достижении к 2030 г. планируемых целей по климатическому переходу, а также делается вывод о том, что недостаточная научная и технологическая проработанность и ясность в возможности 100% декарбонизации при переходе только на возобновляемые источники энергии к 2050 г. не позволяют считать эту цель достижимой.
- Ключевые слова
- США, Канада, «Зелёный новый курс», зелёная промышленная политика, Пакт «Зелёного нового курса», возобновляемые источники энергии, Парижское соглашение по климату, «Построим заново лучшую Америку»
- Дата публикации
- 22.04.2022
- Год выхода
- 2022
- Всего подписок
- 11
- Всего просмотров
- 1039
Библиография
- 1. Ocasio-Cortez, A. Recognizing the Duty of the Federal Government to Create a Green New Deal. H.Res.109—116th Congress (2019–2020) 12.02.2019. Available at: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/ (accessed 20.01.2022).
- 2. Biden for President. Plan for Climate Change and Environmental Justice. 14.07.2020. Available at: https://joebiden.com/climate-plan/ (accessed 20.01.2022).
- 3. Leaders Summit on Climate. Available at: https://www.state.gov/leaders-summit-on-climate/ (accessed 20.01.2022).
- 4. Leaders Summit on Climate. Available at: https://www.state.gov/leaders-summit-on-climate/day-1/ (accessed 20.01.2022).
- 5. Pursuing the Climate Crisis Agenda – 2022. Staff Report. Renewable Resources Journal. 2022, Vol. 36, No. 4, P.2.
- 6. Leaders Summit on Climate. Available at: https://www.commerce.gov/news/blog/2021/04/us-commerce-secretary-gina-raimondo-addresses-clean-energy-economy-and-importance (accessed 21.01.2022).
- 7. Le Pacte, Le Pacte Pour La transition, (2019). https://www.lepacte.ca/en/the- pact/ accessed September 19, 2019.
- 8. Coalition for a Green New Deal, Green New Deal, 2019. Available at: https://act.greennewdealcanada.ca/what-we-heard/ (accessed 21.01.2022)
- 9. Reich, R. Biden is poised to transform how America treats industry. He must follow through. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/apr/17/china-climate-pandemic-biden-us-industrial-policy (accessed 21.01.2022).
- 10. Ibid.
- 11. Ibid.
- 12. Bordoff, J. The Time for a Green Industrial Policy Is Now. Available at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/03/15/biden-climate-energy-transition-green-new-deal-industrial-policy/ (accessed 22.01.2022).
- 13. The Biden Plan for a Clean Energy Revolution and Environmental Justice. Available at: https://joebiden.com/climate-plan/ (accessed 22.01.2022).
- 14. Reash, R.J. Energy and the environment: Striking a balance. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 2021, Vol. 17, Issue 5, Р. 899, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4477
- 15. Ish, J.C. A Road Map to Restoring Rivers: How the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement Might Influence Future Dam Removal and River Restoration Projects. Nature Resources Journal. 2020, Vol. 60, P. 263. Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol60/iss2/6/ (accessed 22.01.2022).
- 16. The Biden Plan for a Clean Energy Revolution and Environmental Justice. Available at: https://joebiden.com/climate-plan/ (accessed 22.01.2022).
- 17. Evans, J. The Green New Deal is the Democrats’ Ticket to a 2022 House Majority. Available at: https://theleaflet.org/home-1/green-new-deal (accessed 23.01.2022).
- 18. Ibid.
- 19. Symons, J. Biden's 2022 climate test. Available at: https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/588581-bidens-2022-climate-test (accessed 23.01.2022).
- 20. International Energy Agency, Special Report. Available at: https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/deebef5d-0c34-4539-9d0c-10b13d840027/NetZeroby2050-ARoadmapfortheGlobalEnergySector_CORR.pdf (accessed 23.01.2022).
- 21. Luhby,T., Lobosco, K. Biden's Build Back Better plan is on ice. Here's what that means for you Available at: https://edition.cnn.com/2021/12/20/politics/joe-biden-build-back-better-setback-explained/index.html (accessed 24.01.2022).
- 22. Build Back Better Act H.R.5376 - 117th Congress (2021-2022) Available at: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/5376 (accessed 24.01.2022).
- 23. Pramuk, J. Biden says he thinks Congress can pass parts of broken-up Build Back Better plan. Available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/19/joe-biden-thinks-congress-can-pass-part-of-build-back-better-act.html (accessed 24.01.2022).
- 24. Wyse, S.M., Hoicka, C.E. “By and for local people”: assessing the connection between local energy plans and community energy. Local Environment 2019, Vol. 24, Issue 9, P. 885. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2019.1652802
- 25. Carroll, W.K. Canada's Carbon - Capital Elite, A tangled web of corporate power. Canadian Journal of Sociology. 2017, Vol. 42, No. 3. P. 235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29173/cjs28258
- 26. Liggio, J., Li, S., Staebler, R.M., Hayden, K., Darlington, A., Mittermeier, R.L., Brien, J.O., Mclaren, R., Wolde, M., Worthy, D., Vogel, F. Measured Canadian oil sands CO2 emissions are higher than estimates made using internationally recommended methods, Nature Communications. 2019, Vol.10, No. 1. P. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09714-9
- 27. Burke, M.J., Stephens, J.C. Political power and renewable energy futures: a critical review. Energy Research & Social Science. 2018, Vol. 35, P. 78-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.018
- 28. Feldpausch-Parker, A.M., Endres, D., Peterson, T.R. Editorial: a research agenda for energy democracy, Frontiers in Communication. 2019, Vol.4, No. 53, P.1-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm. 2019.00053; Lennon, B., Dunphy, N.P., Sanvicente, E. Community acceptability and the energy transition: a citizens perspective, Energy, Sustainability and Society. 2019, Vol. 9, No. 35, P.1-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-19-0218-z
- 29. MacArthur, J.L. Hoicka, Ch.E., Castleden, H., Das, R., Lieue, J. et al. Canada's Green New Deal: Forging the socio-political foundations of climate resilient infrastructure? Energy Research & Social Science Vol., July, P.1-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101442
- 30. Bridge, G., Bouzarovski, S., Bradshaw, M., Eyre, N. Geographies of energy transition: space, place and the low-carbon economy, Energy Policy 2013, Vol. 53, P. 331-332, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.066
- 31. Stefanelli, R. D., Walker, Ch.D., Kornelsen, D., Lewis, D. et al. Renewable energy and energy autonomy: how Indigenous peoples in Canada are shaping an energy future, Environmental Reviews. 2018, Vol.27, P. 95-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2018-0024
- 32. Equal by 30: Balance Means Business. Available at: https://www.cleanenergyministerial.org/sites/default/files/2019-06/Equal%20by%2030%20Balance%20Means%20Business%20Report.pdf (accessed 25.01.2022).
- 33. Baker, K.J., Mould, R., Restrick, S. Rethink fuel poverty as a complex problem. Nature Energy. 2018. Vol.3, P. 610-612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0204-2
- 34. Tobin, P. Leaders and Laggards: Climate Policy Ambition in Developed States. Global Environmental Politics. 2017, Vol.17, No.4, P. 28–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00433
- 35. Oatley, T. Energy and the Complexity of International Order. Global Environmental Politics. 2021, Vol. 21, No. 4, P. 20–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00637
- 36. Duke, J., Watson, R., Knorr, W. Climate Scientists: Concept of Net Zero Is a Dangerous Trap. The Conversation, 22.04.2021. Available at: https://theconversation.com/amp/climate-scientists-concept-of-net-zero-is-a-dangerous-trap-157368 (accessed 25.01.2022).
- 37. Oatley, T. Energy and the Complexity of International Order. Р.32. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00637
- 38. Fang, C.C. The case for environmental advocacy. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 2021, Vol. 11, Р.169. DOI: https://doi.Org/10.1007/s13412-020-00650-5
- 39. Le Quéré, C., Jackson, R.B., Jones, M.W. et al. Temporary reduction in daily global CO2 emissions during the COVID-19 forced confinement. National Climate Change. 2020, Vol. 10, P. 647-653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0797-x
- 40. Epstein, K., Wood, D. J. A., Roemer, K., Currey, B., Duff, H., Gay, J. D., Goemann, H., Loewen, S., Milligan, M. C., Wendt, J. A. F., Brookshire, E. J., Maxwell, B. D., McNew, L., McWethy, D. B., Stoy, P.C., Haggerty, J. H. Toward an urgent yet deliberate conservation strategy: sustaining social-ecological systems in rangelands of the Northern Great Plains, Montana. Ecology and Society, 2021, Vol. 26, No.1, P. 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12141-260110
- 41. Reash, R.J. Energy and the environment: Striking a balance. P. 900.
- 42. The role of critical minerals in clean energy transitions. IEA. Flagship report — May 2021. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-critical-minerals-in-clean-energy-transitions (accessed 26.01.2022).
- 43. Oatley, T. Energy and the Complexity of International Order Р.39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00637