- PII
- S30346010S0132162525050077-1
- DOI
- 10.7868/S3034601025050077
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume / Issue number 5
- Pages
- 80-89
- Abstract
- The article presents a critical review of the debate on civilizational identity in contemporary social science. The theory of clash of civilizations is discussed as an example of the essentialist approach to that problem. It is argued in the article that this approach did not make a substantial theoretical contribution to civilizational analysis and lacks empirical confirmation. Social constructivism represents an alternative to the essentialist approach. From the constructivist perspective civilizations are characterized as imagined communities. However, that perspective displays some limitations in conducting empirical research. It has been argued that civilizational identity can be studied with the same methodological tools as any other form of identity. Nevertheless, it should be taken into account that civilizational identity in today's societies is generally weaker than its national or regional forms. The article highlights the peculiarities of civilizational analysis in contemporary historical sociology. It is emphasized that this approach occupies an intermediate position between essentialism and constructivism. The article makes a conclusion that historical civilizations - from the axial age to modern times - can be discussed from the essentialist perspective although these civilizations were more changeable than essentialism supposes. At the same time studies of civilizational identity in today's societies should draw on a moderate version of constructivism.
- Keywords
- историческая социология цивилизационный анализ модерн эссенциализм конструктивизм воображаемое сообщество
- Date of publication
- 11.12.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 60
References
- 1. Арнасон Й. Цивилизационные паттерны и исторические процессы. М.: НЛО, 2021.
- 2. Браславский Р. Г., Козловский В. В. Цивилизационный поворот в социологии: вклад Ш. Н. Эйзенштадта // Социологические исследования. 2023. № 10. С. 116-125.
- 3. Ильин В. И. Локальная цивилизация как воображаемое сообщество // Цивилизационное многообразие современного мира / Отв. ред. Р. Г. Браславский, А. В. Малинов. М.; СПб.: ФНИСЦ РАН, 2024. С. 348-366.
- 4. Ионов И. Н. Цивилизационное сознание и историческое знание: проблемы взаимодействия. М.: Наука, 2007.
- 5. Капустин Б. Г. Политические смыслы цивилизации // Политическая концептология: журнал междисциплинарных исследований. 2009. № 3. С. 23-48.
- 6. Карбаинов Н. И., Галиндабаева В. В. Цивилизационные исторические дискурсы в постсоветском Татарстане: коммеморативные проекты элит и массовые представления // Российское общество: архитектоника цивилизационного развития / Отв. ред. В. В. Козловский. М.; СПб.: ФНИСЦ РАН, 2021. С. 175-247.
- 7. Летняков Д. Э. Цивилизации как «воображаемые сообщества»: к конструктивистской критике цивилизационной теории // Личность. Культура. Общество. 2021. Т. 23. Вып. 3. С. 57-69.
- 8. Ломанов А. В. Общечеловеческий Китай и абстрактный Запад // Россия в глобальной политике. 2025. Т. 23. № 2. С. 207-226.
- 9. Масловский М. В. Современный цивилизационный анализ в исторической социологии: проблемы и перспективы // Социологические исследования. 2022. № 3. С. 3-12.
- 10. Терборн Й. Мир: руководство для начинающих. М.: ВШЭ, 2015.
- 11. Хантингтон С. Столкновение цивилизаций. М.: АСТ, 2003.
- 12. Arnason J. P. Civilizations in Dispute: Historical Questions and Theoretical Traditions. Leiden: Brill, 2003.
- 13. Arnason J. P. The Labyrinth of Modernity: Horizons, Pathways and Mutations. L.: Rowman and Littlefield, 2020.
- 14. Bettiza G. Civilizational Analysis in International Relations: Mapping the Field and Advancing a “Civilizational Politics” Line of Research // International Studies Review. 2014. No. 16(1). P. 1-28.
- 15. Bettiza G., Petito F. Why (Clash of) Civilizations Discourses Just Won’t Go Away? Understanding the Civilizational Politics of Our Times // The “Clash of Civilizations” 25 Years on: A Multidisciplinary Appraisal / Ed. by D. Orsi. Bristol: E-International Relations, 2018. P. 37-51.
- 16. Blackburn M. Mainstream Russian Nationalism and the “State-Civilization” Identity: Perspectives from Below // Nationalities Papers. 2021. No. 49(1). P. 89-107.
- 17. Casanova J. Cosmopolitanism, the Clash of Civilizations and Multiple Modernities // Current Sociology. 2011. No. 59(2). P. 252-267.
- 18. Coker C. The Rise of the Civilizational State. Cambridge: Polity, 2019.
- 19. Collins R. Civilizations as Zones of Prestige and Social Contact // International Sociology. 2001. No. 16(3). P. 421-437.
- 20. Hale H., Laruelle M. A New Wave of Research on Civilizational Politics // Nationalities Papers. 2021. No. 49(4). P. 597-608.
- 21. Hale H., Laruelle M. Rethinking Civilizational Identity from the Bottom up: A Case Study of Russia and a Research Agenda // Nationalities Papers. 2020. No. 48(3). P. 585-602.
- 22. Haug S., Roychoudhury S. Civilizational Exceptionalism in International Affairs: Making Sense of Indian and Turkish Claims // International Affairs. 2023. No. 99(2). P. 531-549.
- 23. Katzenstein P. A World of Plural and Pluralist Civilizations: Multiple Actors, Traditions and Practices // Civilizations in World Politics: Plural and Pluralist Perspectives / Ed. by P. Katzenstein. N. Y.: Routledge, 2010. P. 1-40.
- 24. Katzenstein P. China’s Rise: Rupture, Return or Recombination? // Sinicization and the Rise of China: Civilizational Processes Beyond East and West / Ed. by P. Katzenstein. Abingdon: Routledge, 2012. P. 1-38.
- 25. Knöbl W. The Sociological Discourse on “Modernization” and “Modernity” // Revue Internationale de Philosophie. 2017. No. 3. Р. 311-329.
- 26. Smith J. Civilizational Analysis as a Mode of the Intercultural: Intercivilizational Encounters, the Intercultural and Contemporary Historical Sociology // Journal of Intercultural Studies. 2024. No. 45(2). P. 310-325.
- 27. Smith J. Debating Civilisations: Interrogating Civilisational Analysis in a Global Age. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2017.
- 28. Therborn G. States, Nations and Civilizations // Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences. 2021. No. 14(2). P. 225-242.
