RAS Social ScienceСоциологические исследования Sotsialogicheski issledovania

  • ISSN (Print) 0132-1625
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-6010

THE WAYS INVOLVED FATHERHOOD AND CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS WITH FATHERS AFFECT WELL-BEING OF ADOLESCENTS

PII
S30346010S0132162525060086-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034601025060086
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue number 6
Pages
92-104
Abstract
The article aims to analyze the influence of involved fatherhood and close relationships with the father on the subjective well-being and development of a psychologically healthy personality of adolescents. Based on the assessment of fathers’ contribution to the upbringing of adolescents during the childhood and adolescence periods, we can assume that there is a trend for the shift from traditional to involved fatherhood. The research shows that involved fatherhood serves as the basis for the development of close relationships between fathers and adolescents. We can trace gender differences in fathers’ relationships with children: boys get more attention from fathers than girls, and fathers’ communication with boys is more diverse and intense. We found out the gender-related nature of the father’s influence on the personal development of adolescents in groups with different degrees of closeness. Fathers who maintain close relationships make an important contribution to the development of a strong and stable personality of adolescents. Boys develop resilience, the ability to manage their feelings, confidence, a calm attitude to criticism, and independence, while girls develop the desire for self-development, positivity, kindness and mindfulness. Teenagers with distant relationships with their fathers have a lack of communication with them, which is most strongly manifested in their emotional sphere. The most vulnerable are girls, who experience the whole range of subjective experiences of distress.
Keywords
отцовство вовлеченное отцовство подростки субъективное благополучие близкие отношения отношения с отцом
Date of publication
05.06.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
45

References

  1. 1. Безрукова О.Н., Самойлова В.А. «Продиктовано любовью…»: вовлеченное отцовство в российских семьях, воспитывающих детей с инвалидностью // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2022a. № 5. С. 122–148. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2022.5.2184.
  2. 2. Безрукова О.Н., Самойлова В.А. Отцовство в современной России: смыслы, ценности, практики и межпоколенческая трансляция // Социологические исследования. 2022b. № 2. С. 94–106. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250016969-0.
  3. 3. Безрукова О.Н., Самойлова В.А. Отношения с отцом как фактор вовлеченности в отцовство молодых мужчин в многодетных семьях // Социологические исследования. 2024. № 11. С. 87–99. DOI: 10.31857/S0132162524110076.
  4. 4. Гурко Т.А. Динамика показателей развития и благополучия подростков в различных типах семей // Социологические исследования. 2022. № 10. С. 107–116. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250021397-9.
  5. 5. Дорофеева З.Е., Козырева П.М. Трансформация практик вовлеченности родителей в жизнь детей // Социологические исследования. 2023. № 8. С. 86–100. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250027370-0.
  6. 6. Капитеевская Е.Р., Леонтьев Д.А. Пути становления самодетерминации личности в подростковом возрасте // Вопросы психологии. 2006. № 3. С. 49–55.
  7. 7. Малиева Е.С. Личностная зрелость человека в современном социуме XXI века // Психология. Историко-критические обзоры и современные исследования. 2022. Т. 11. № 3A. С. 9–24. DOI: 10.34670/AR.2022.72.31.001.
  8. 8. Татарова Г.Г., Кучегкова А.В. Показатели субъективного благополучия как типообразующие признаки // Социологические исследования. 2016. № 10. С. 21–32.
  9. 9. Шевченко И.О. Отцы и отцовство в современной России: социологический анализ. М.: Тровант, 2019.
  10. 10. Campbell O., Bann D., Patalay P. The Gender Gap in Adolescent Mental Health: A Cross-national Investigation of 566,829 Adolescents across 73 Countries // SSM Population Health. 2021. Vol. 26. No. 13. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100742.
  11. 11. Dyer W., Kaufman R. et al. Measures of Father Engagement for Nonresident Fathers // Family Relations. 2018. No. 67(3). P. 381–398. DOI: 10.1111/fare.12317.
  12. 12. Inglehart R.F., Peterson C. et al. Development, Freedom and Rising Happiness: A Global Perspective 1981–2007 // Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2008. Vol. 3. No. 4. P. 264–285.
  13. 13. Lamb M.E. How Do Fathers Influence Children’s Development? Let Me Count the Ways. In: Lamb M.E. (ed.) The Role of the Father in Child Development. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. 2010. P. 1–26.
  14. 14. O’Gara J.L., Zhang A. et al. Father-youth closeness and adolescent self-rated health: The mediating role of mental health // Children and Youth Services Review. 2019. Vol. 104. DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104386.
  15. 15. Palkovitz R. Expanding our focus from father involvement to father-child relationship quality // Journal of Family Theory & Review. 2019. No. 11(4). P. 576–591. DOI: 10.1111/jftr.123.
  16. 16. Trahan M.H., Morley R.H., Shafer K. Father-Adolescent relationship closeness: A path analysis of family factor associates with father-adolescent engagement and relationship quality // Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal. 2021. No. 38(3). P. 265–282. DOI: 10.1007/s10560-020-00677-1.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library