Везде

RAS Social ScienceСоциологические исследования Sotsialogicheski issledovania

  • ISSN (Print) 0132-1625
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-6010

HOW CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS WITH THE FATHER IMPACT FAMILY AND REPRODUCTIVE ATTITUDES OF ADOLESCENTS

You can
PII
S30346010S0132162525070109-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034601025070109
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Olga N. Bezrukova
  • Occupation: Cand. Sci. (Social.), Assoc. Prof.
  • Affiliation: St. Petersburg State University
Valentina A. Samoylova
  • Occupation: Cand. Sci. (Psychol.), Associate Professor
  • Affiliation: St. Petersburg State University
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue number 7
Pages
110-124
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the influence of involved fatherhood and close relationships with the father on the development of family and reproductive attitudes in adolescents. It shows the contradictory and ambiguous nature of the family consciousness of adolescents; along with giving priority to their careers, being geared towards delayed parenthood, and weakening the standard of having children in a family, the majority of teenagers do not deny that their parenthood may be challenging, including responsibilities for a disabled or adopted child or raising children alone. They show acceptance and potential willingness to follow a new cultural norm – men’s involvement in caring for their children, "good" fatherhood on the basis of the equality of rights and duties in raising children between mothers and fathers. The paper identifies gender-specific aspects of the father’s influence on the development of reproductive and parental attitudes in adolescents for varying degrees of closeness of relationships with their fathers. The most pronounced attitudes typical of boys who have close relationships with their fathers reflect the significance of the paternal role, responsibility for the family and the birth of children, self-confidence, self-reliance, and ability to withstand difficulties. Girls develop more humane attitudes towards unborn children, tend to plan the optimal time for childbearing, realize the importance of father’s contribution to the upbringing of a child and of having children in wedlock. Those boys who fail to have close relationships with their fathers are distinguished by a mindset towards being single, seeking career achievements, individualism, unwillingness to take responsibility for a family and children, and infantile personality. Girls have attitudes that accept divorce, raising children out of wedlock and without a father, permissibility of abortion, and refusal to have many children.
Keywords
отцовство вовлеченное отцовство подростки родительские установки близкие отношения отношения с отцом
Date of publication
17.11.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
39

References

  1. 1. Безрукова О. Н., Самойлова В. А. Как вовлеченное отцовство и близкие отношения с отцом влияют на благополучие подростков // Социологические исследования. 2025. № 6. С. 92–104. DOI: 10.31857/S0132162525060086.
  2. 2. Bezrukova O. N., Samoylova V. A. (2025) Involved Fatherhood, Close Relationships with Fathers and Well-being of Adolescents. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 6: 92–104. DOI: 10.31857/S0132162525060086. (In Russ.)
  3. 3. Безрукова О. Н., Самойлова В. В. Отцовство в современной России: смыслы, ценности, практики и межпоколенческая трансляция // Социологические исследования. 2022. № 2. С. 94–106. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250016969.
  4. 4. Bezrukova O. N., Samoylova V. A. (2022) Fatherhood in Modern Russia: Meanings, Values, Practices and Intergenerational Translation. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No.2: 94–106. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250016970-0. (In Russ.)
  5. 5. Безрукова О. Н. Модели родительства и родительский потенциал: межпоколенный анализ // Социологические исследования. 2014. № 9. С. 85–97.
  6. 6. Bezrukova O. N. (2014) Parenthood Models and Rarents Rotential: Intergenerational Analysis. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 9: 85–97. (In Russ.)
  7. 7. Боулби Д. Привязанность. М.: Гардарики, 2003.
  8. 8. Boulbi D. (2003) Attachment. Moscow: Gardariki. (In Russ.)
  9. 9. Гурко Т. А. Новые семейные формы: тенденции распространения и понятия // Социологические исследования. 2017. № 11. С. 99–110. DOI: 10.7868/S0132162517110113.
  10. 10. Gurko T. A. (2017) New Family Forms: Tendencies of Spreading and Concepts. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 11: 99–110. DOI: 10.7868/S0132162517110113. (In Russ.)
  11. 11. Гурко Т. А., Тарченко В. С. Динамика брачных установок и планов студентов // Социологические исследования. 2019. № 7. С. 102–113. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250005797-9.
  12. 12. Gurko T. A., Tarchenko V. S. (2019). Dynamics of Students’ Marital Attitudes and Plans. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No.7: 102–113. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250005797-9. (In Russ.)
  13. 13. Дементьева И. Ф., Борисова Т. С., Сартакова Е. Е. Особенности воспитательного влияния отца и матери на формирование жизненных ориентиров детей // Научно-­педагогическое обозрение. 2020. № 3(31). С. 191–200.
  14. 14. Dementiyeva I. F., Borisova T. S., Sartakova E. E. (2020) Features of the Educational Influence of the Father and Mother on the Formation of Life Guidelines of Children. Nauchno-­pedagogicheskoe obozrenie [Pedagogical Review]. 2020. No. 3(31): 191–200. (In Russ.)
  15. 15. Карабанова О. А., Молчанов С. В. Семейные факторы в формировании родительских установок у студенческой молодежи на этапе вхождения во взрослость // Национальный психологический журнал. 2017. № 2(26). С. 92–97. DOI: 10.11621/npj.2017.0210.
  16. 16. Karabanova O. A., Molchanov S. V. (2017) Family Factors in the Formation of Parental Attitudes in Student Youth at the Stage of Entering Adulthood. Natsional’nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal [National Psychological Journal]. No. 2(26): 92–97. (In Russ.)
  17. 17. Карпова В. М. Особенности межпоколенной трансляции семейных ценностей // Вестник Московского ун-та. Сер. 18. Социология и политология. 2019. Т. 25. № 3. С. 117–139. DOI: 10.24290/1029-3736-2019-25-3-117-139.
  18. 18. Karpova V. M. (2019) Features of the Intergenerational Transmission of Family Values. Vestnik Moskovskogo un-ta. Ser. 18. Sociologiya i politologiya. [MSU Bulletin. Ser. 18. Sociology and Political Science]. Vol. 25. No. 3: 117–139. DOI: 10.24290/1029-3736-2019-25-3-117-139. (In Russ.)
  19. 19. Логинов Д. М. Традиционные и новые паттерны демографического поведения современной городской молодежи // Народонаселение. 2021. Т. 24. № 2. С. 165–178. DOI: 10.19181/ population.2021.24.2.15.
  20. 20. Loginov D. M. (2021) Traditional and New Patterns of Today’s Urban Youth Demographic Behavior. Narodonaselenie [Population]. Vol. 24. No. 2: 165–178. DOI: 10.19181/population.2021.24.2.15. (In Russ.)
  21. 21. Назарова И. Б., Зеленская М. П. Приоритеты студентов российских вузов: обучение, семья, работа // Вестник РУДН. Социология. 2020. Т. 20. № 4. С. 919–928. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2020-20-4-919-928.
  22. 22. Nazarova I. B., Zelenskaya M. P. (2020) Priorities of the Student Youth: Education, Family, Work. Vestnik RUDN. Sociologiya [RUDN Journal of Sociology]. No. 20(4): 919–928. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2020-20-4-919-928. (In Russ.)
  23. 23. Сапоровская М. В., Екимчик О. А., Опекина Т. П. Близкие отношения: теоретический обзор исследований и концептуализация модели // Вестник Костромского госун-та. Педагогика. Психология. Социокинетика. 2021. Т. 27. № 4. С. 144–154. DOI: 10.34216/2073-1426-2021-27-4-144-154.
  24. 24. Saporovskaya M. V., Ekimchik O. A., Opekina T. P. (2021) Close Relationship: a Theoretical Survey of Research and Conceptualisation of the Model. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosun-ta. Pedagogika. Psihologiya. [Bulletin of Kostroma State University. Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics]. Vol. 27. No. 4: 144–154. DOI:10.34216/2073-1426-2021-27-4-144-154. (In Russ.)
  25. 25. Синельников А. Б. Социально-­демографическая дифференциация рождаемости в России // Социологические исследования. 2023. № 12. С. 95–107. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250029340-7.
  26. 26. Sinelnikov A. B. (2023) Socio-demographic Differentiation of Fertility in Russia. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 12: 95–107. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250029340-7. (In Russ.)
  27. 27. Kuscul G. H., Adamsons K.A Personal and Relational Model of Father Identity Construction // Journal of Family Theory & Review. 2022. Vol.14. No. 1. P. 1–16. DOI: 10.1111/jftr.12451.
  28. 28. Palkovitz R. Expanding Our Focus from Father Involvement to Father-­child Relationship Quality // Journal of Family Theory & Review. 2019. No. 11(4). P. 576–591. DOI: 10.1111/jftr.123.
  29. 29. Roy K. M. Father StoriesA Life Course Examination of Paternal Identity Among Low-­Income African American Men // Journal of Family. 2006. No. 27(1). P. 31–54. DOI: 10.1177/0192513X05275432.
  30. 30. Schofield T. J., Abraham W. T. Intergenerational Continuity in Attitudes: a Latent Variable Family Fixed-effects Approach // Journal of Family Psychology. 2017. No. 31(8). P. 1005–1016. DOI:10.1037/fam0000375.
  31. 31. Ünlü-­Çetin S., Olgan R. The Effect of Perceived Intergenerational Paternal Involvement on Fathers’ involvement in the Lives of their 0 to 8 year-old Children // Early Child Development and Care. 2019. DOI: 10.1080/03004430.2019.1603150.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library