Везде
REINDUSTRIALIZATION: SOCIO-ECONOMIC DIMENSIONS OF REINTEGRATION OF PRODUCTION, SCIENCE AND EDUCATION
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
REINDUSTRIALIZATION: SOCIO-ECONOMIC DIMENSIONS OF REINTEGRATION OF PRODUCTION, SCIENCE AND EDUCATION
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000376-9-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Sergei Bodrunov 
Edition
Volume 382 Issue 2
Pages
20-28
Abstract
The article shows that the problems facing Russia are one of the reasons for deep deindustrialization, which has led to systemic negative social and economic consequences. To denote the essence of deindustrialization, the author uses the concept of "the effect of four "D"" (by analogy with the well-known concept of four "I" in Russian economic policy): disorganization of the production process, degradation of applied technologies, dequalification of labor, decompilation (simplification) of the product of production. As an alternative, the author suggests a course on reindustrialization for the growth of human potential. The author justifies the new socio-economic strategy of Russia: 1) focus on reviving the remaining foundations of high-tech structures; 2) rely on market incentives, public-private partnerships, long-term government programs and active industrial policies; 3) create long-term development institutions for the organizational and legal support of this policy; 4) advanced development of multi-level professional education integrated with production and industry science; 5) support of scientific developments focused on the development of Russian industry. Especially important in this strategy are the integration of production with education and science.
Keywords
labor; human qualities; social priorities of economic development; reindustrialization; production; science; education
Date of publication
01.02.2016
Number of purchasers
1
Views
397
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Amosov A.I. O vozmozhnosti dostizheniya tselevykh indikatorov novogo industrial'nogo razvitiya // Vestnik Instituta ehkonomiki RAN. 2014. № 4. S. 21–32.


Bell D. Gryaduschee postindustrial'noe obschestvo. M.: Akademiya, 2009.


Bodrunov S.D. Reindustrializatsiya rossijskoj ehkonomiki – vozmozhnosti i ogranicheniya // Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo ehkonomicheskogo obschestva Rossii. 2014. № 1. S. 15–46.


Bodrunov S.D., Grinberg R.S. Chto delat'? Imperativy, vozmozhnosti i problemy reindustrializatsii // Analiticheskij vestnik Soveta Federatsii № 9 (503) / Pod red. V.D. Krivova. M.: Izd-vo Soveta Federatsii RF, 2013. S. 8–25.


Bodrunov S.D., Grinberg R.S., Sorokin D.E. Reindustrializatsiya rossijskoj ehkonomiki: imperativy, potentsial, riski // Ehkonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii. 2013. № 1. S. 19–49.


Vse sanktsii Zapada protiv Rossii // TASS. Mezhdunarodnaya panorama. 4 maya 2014 g. URL: http:// itar-tass.com/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/1055587? page=9/ (data obrascheniya: 05.06.2015).


Vypusk kvalifitsirovannykh rabochikh i sluzhaschikh po professiyam / Rosstat. 2014. URL: http:// www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/population/obraz/np-vip1.doc/ (data obrascheniya: 05.06.2015).


Indeks promyshlennogo proizvodstva / Rosstat. 2015. URL: http://www.gks.ru/bgd/free/b00_24/ ssWWW.exe/Stg/d000/I001700R.HTM (data obrascheniya: 03.06.2015).


Karlik A.E., Osipov M.A. Sostoyanie i perspektivy makroehkonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossii v kontekste teorii ehkonomicheskogo rosta s uchetom krizisnykh yavlenij // Ehkonomicheskie nauki. 2009. № 8. S. 12–18.


Kastel's M. Informatsionnaya ehpokha: ehkonomika, obschestva i kul'tura / Per. s angl. pod. nauch. red. O.I. Shkaratana. M.: GU VShEh, 2000.


Kudrin A.L., Gurvich E. Novaya model' rosta dlya rossijskoj ehkonomiki // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2004. № 12. S. 4–36.


Popov A.I. Neoindustrializatsiya rossijskoj ehkonomiki kak uslovie ustojchivogo razvitiya // Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ehkonomicheskogo universiteta. 2014. № 3. S. 7–12.


Popov A.I., Plotnikov V.A. Vybor novoj modeli razvitiya i modernizatsiya: osnovy perekhoda k innovatsionnoj ehkonomike // Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ehkonomicheskogo universiteta. 2012. № 2. S. 197–209.


Privalov A. O polykhaevskom forume // Ehkspert. 2015. № 5. S. 9–10. Proizvodstvo mashin i oborudovaniya / Rosstat. 2010. URL: http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/ business/prom/natura/natura38g.htm (data obrascheniya: 05.06.2015).


Promyshlennost' Rossii: Stat. sb. / Rosstat. M., 2002–2014.


Pshenichnikova S.N. Investitsii i ehkonomicheskij rost v evrazijskikh stranakh // Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ehkonomicheskogo universiteta. 2013. № 5. S. 14–26.


Sakajya T. Stoimost', sozdavaemaya znaniem, ili Istoriya buduschego // Novaya postindustrial'naya volna na Zapade: antologiya / Pod. red. V.L. Inozemtseva. M.: Academia, 1999. S. 337–371.


Tatarkin A.I. Protrezvlenie posle rynochnoj ehjforii zatyanulos', no vse-taki proiskhodit. Interv'yu // Gorod 812. 2014. № 32. S. 21–23.


Cairncross A. What is deindustrialization? // Blackaby F. (ed.) Deindustrialization. London: Pergamon, 1982. P. 5–17.


Lirzin F., Schramm C. Reindustrialising Europe: the issues at stake in a European Innovation and Industrial Policy // Foundation Robert Schuman, European Issues No. 256 (October 23, 2012). URL: www.robert-schuman.eu/en/doc/questions-d-europe/qe-256-en.pdf (accessed: 05.06.2015).


Plotnikov V., Vertakova J. Manufacturing industry in Russia: problems, status, prospects // Procedia Economics and Finance. 2014. Vol. 14. R. 499–506. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00739-4/ (accessed: 05.06.2015).


Public-Private Partnership for Innovation: Policy Rationale, Trends and Issues. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2003.


The role of banks, equity markets and institutional investors in long-term financing for growth and development. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2013.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate