SOCIAL FUTURE IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF DIALECTICAL THEORY
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
SOCIAL FUTURE IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF DIALECTICAL THEORY
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000392-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Pages
3-12
Abstract
The article examines theoretical and methodological approaches to studying social future. Most of such studies in sociology are represented by descriptions and explanations of social phenomena observed “here and now”. However, object and subject in sociology are diachronic: the object of sociology is the present, but its subject (explicit or latent) is the future. Three approaches characterized by varying relationship between the present as an obvious object and the future as not always thoroughly recognized subject can be traced in the history of theoretical sociology. H. Marcuse’s critical theory of society is analyzed as a successful actualization of dialectical approach deriving the model of social future from negative trends of the present. Applying dialectical approach to analysis of curent forms of capitalism and movements for freedom and equality allows to reveal emergence of new forms of social control and inequality.
Keywords
social future, critical theory, Marcuse, utopia, social control, inequality, network structures, flow structures
Date of publication
01.08.2016
Number of purchasers
1
Views
468
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Bell D. Gryadushchee postindustrial'noe obshchestvo. M.: Academia, 2004.

Berger P., Lukman T. Social'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti. M.: Academia-Centr, 1995.

Boltanski L., K'yapello E. Novyj duh kapitalizma. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2011.

Vasil'kova V.V. Poryadok i haos v razvitii social'nyh sistem. SPb.: Lan', 1999.

Vahshtajn V.S. Sociologiya povsednevnosti i teoriya frejmov. SPb.: Izd-vo Evropejskogo universiteta, 2011.

Veber M. Izbrannoe: protestantskaya etika i duh kapitalizma. M.: Centr gumanitarnyh iniciativ, 2013.

Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M.: Progress, 1990.

Gofman I. Predstavlenie sebya drugim v povsednevnoj zhizni. M.: Kanon-Press, 2000.

Dyurkgejm E. O razdelenii obshchestvennogo truda. Metod sociologii. M.: Nauka, 1991.

Erofeeva M.A. Relyativistskaya programma v sociologii: ot povsednevnosti k novoj ontologii social'nogo // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. 2014. № 1. S. 134–137.

Ivanov D.V. Glamurnyj kapitalizm: logika “sverhnovoj” ekonomiki // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2011. № 7. C. 44–61.

Ivanov D.V. Glem-kapitalizm. SPb.: Peterburgskoe vostokovedenie, 2008.

Kapica S.P., Kurdyumov S.P., Malineckij G.G. Sinergetika i prognozy budushchego. M.: URSS, 2003.

Kont O. Obshchij obzor pozitivizma. M.: Librokom, 2012.

Marks K., Engel's F. Sochineniya. 2-e izd. T. 3. M.: Izd-vo politicheskoj lit., 1955.

Marks K., Engel's F. Sochineniya. 2-e izd. T. 21. M.: Izd-vo politicheskoj lit., 1961.

Nejsbit D. Megatrendy. M.: AST, 2003.

Parsons T. Sistema sovremennyh obshchestv. M.: Aspekt Press, 1997.

Popper K. Nishcheta istoricizma // Voprosy filosofii. 1992. № 10. S. 29–58.

Toffler E. Shok budushchego. M.: AST, 2008.

Appadurai A. Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy // Global Culture: Nationalism, Globalization and Modernity. London: SAGE, 1990.

Baaghil S., Mossalli M., Ashour R., Khashogji Y. Glamour Globals: Trends over Brands. Bloomington, 2013.

Billett M., Jiang Zhan, Rego L. Glamour Brands and Glamour Stocks // Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization. 2014. Vol. 107. Spec. Issue, Nov. P. 744–759.

Bauman Z. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge, 2000. Beck U. Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1986.

Blumer H. Symbolic Interactionism. Englewood Cliffs: Perspective and Method. New Jersey: Prentice- Hall, 1969.

Burawoy M. For Public Sociology // American Sociological Review. 2005.Vol. 70. № 1. P. 4–28.

Castells M. The Rise of the Network Society. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2000.

Fuente E., Murphey P. (eds) Aesthetic Capitalism (Social and Critical Theory). Boston: Brill Academic Publishers, 2014.

Holton R. Talcott Parsons: Conservative Apologist or Irreplaceable Icon? // Handbook of Social Theory / ed. by G. Ritzer, B. Smart. London: SAGE Publications, 2001.

Norkheimer M. Traditional and Critical Theory // Critical Sociology. Harmondsworth (Mx): Penguin Books, 1976.

Latour B. On Interobjectivity // Mind, Culture, and Activity. 1996. Vol. 3. № 4. P. 228–245.

Latour B. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford, 2005.

Marcuse H. Eros and Civilization. Boston: Beacon Press, 1955. Marcuse H. One-Dimensional Man. Boston: Beacon Press, 1964.

Marcuse H. Philosophy and Critical Theory // Critical Theory and Society. New York: Routledge, 1989.

Marcuse H. Reason and Revolution. Oxford University Press, 1941.

Mill J.S. The Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy. London: John W. Parker, West Strand, 1848.

Molm L. Theories of Social Exchange and Exchange Networks // Handbook of Social Theory, ed. by G. Ritzer, B. Smart. London: SAGE, 2001.

Parsons T., Shils E., Naegle K., Pitts J. (eds) Theories of Society. New York: Simon & Schuster, The Free Press, 1961.

Spencer H. The Study of Sociology. New York: D. Appleton & Co, 1896.

Urry J. Sociology beyond Societies. Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century. London and New York, 2000.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate