Везде
RUSSIA STILL HAS A CHANCE TO BECOME A DEVELOPED COUNTRY. WHAT CAN BE TAKEN FROM THE EXPERIENCE OF CHINA?
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
RUSSIA STILL HAS A CHANCE TO BECOME A DEVELOPED COUNTRY. WHAT CAN BE TAKEN FROM THE EXPERIENCE OF CHINA?
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000392-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Aleksey Kiva 
Edition
Volume 395 Issue 3
Pages
134-143
Abstract

A.V. Kiva in his article discusses the main causes of current crisis of the Russian economy. According to him, it has roots in the early 1990s, when a young and inexperienced team of reformers began the implementation of not their own, but created in the Washington Institute for International Economics reform model. It is based on neo-liberal theory, the main tenet of which is the maxima: the market itself will put everything in place. Transition of directive-planned economy, virtually closed to foreign competition, needed a model of state regulation. But on coincidence of circumstances the situation in Russia is so that economic bloc in the government is still led by supporters of the neoliberal school. They also develop a medium term program of socio-economic development after 2018. A. Kiva supposes that the implementation of a well thought out neo-liberal project, perhaps, could lead the economy out of the crisis, but it is powerless to provide a breakthrough to a new quality. This requires mobilization project, and the approaches closest to it are suggested by scientists of Russian Academy of Sciences. A. Kiva considers it necessary to use in the preparation of a new model the experience of China. The most important components of its rapid growth he sees in the creation of a competitive environment not only in the economy but also in politics.

Keywords
J.A. Schumpeter, W. Leontief, R.A. Mundell, J. Ross, V. Neveikin
Date of publication
01.03.2017
Number of purchasers
23
Views
485
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Anderson Dzh.(2008). Ekonomicheskii rost i gosudarstvo v Kitae. Lektsiya v literaturnom klube Moskvy [Economic Growth and the State in China. Lecture in Moscow’s literature club Lingua]. URL: http://www.diary.ru/~tired-pilot/p49043719.htm?oam (accessed: 06.07.2016). (In Russ.)

Bogomolov O. (2012) Umny zadnim umom [We are smart in hindsight]. URL: http://knu.znate.ru/docs/index-412180.html (accessed: 11.08.2016). (In Russ.)

Grinberg R. (2009) Tret’ya ulybka fortuny [The third smile of Fortune]. Vedomosti. URL: http://www.vedomosti.ru/newspaper/article.shtml?2009/07/01/202824 (accessed 07. 09.2013) (In Russ.)

Kiva A.V. (2006) Rossiiskie reformy v kontekste mirovogo opyta. Voprosy teorii i politicheskoi praktiki [Russian reforms in thecontext of world experience. Issues of theory and political practice]. Moscow: Institut vostokovedeniya Rossiiskoi Akademii nauk: 121–146 (In Russ.)

Kiva A.V. (2015) Reformy v Kitae i Rossii: sravnitel’nyi analiz [Reforms in China and Russia: comparative analysis]. Moscow: Institut vostokovedeniya Rossiiskoi Akademii nauk (In Russ.)

Kiva A.V.(2011) Reformy komandy V. Putina v istoricheskom kontekste Sravnitel’nyi analiz [Reforms of Vladimir Putin’ Command in a Historical Context. Comparative Analyses]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo “Korona-Media”. P. 73. (In Russ.)

Mirkin Ja.M. (2016) Ne khvataet jekonomiki [Not enough economy]. Argumenty i fakty. № 37: 9. Moscow.

Pliskevich N.M. (2015).Transformatsiya vlasti-sobstvennosti v Rossii: regional’nyi aspekt. Reformy i kachestvo gosudarstva [Transformation of power-property in Russia: regional aspect. Reforms and the quality of the state]. Mir Rossii. No. 1: 8–34. (In Russ.)

Polterovich V. (2006) U nas eshche sokhranyayutsya shansy na proryv [We still have a Chance for a Breakthrough]. URL: http://www.nakanune.ru/articles/victor_polterovich_u_nas_ eshche (accessed 11.10. 2016). (In Russ.)

Polterovich V.M. (2007) Rossiya v 2008–2016 gg.: stsenarii ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [Russia in 2008–2016: the scenarios of economic development]. URL: http://www.c-societe.ru/wind.php? ID=315888&soch=1 (accessed 07.08.2016). (In Russ.)

Ross Dzh. (1994) “Zamok c priwideniyami opustel” [The haunted castle got empty]. Delovoi mir. 03. 03. Shumpeter I. (2007) Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [The theory of economic development]. Moscow: Izd-vo “Eksmo” (In Russ.)

Vodyanova M. (2000) Mandell Robert: “Iz loshadi sdelali verblyuda” [“А horse was made a camel”]. Mir za nedelyu. Moscow: Mir za nedelyu. No. 8. 03. 03. (In Russ.)

Zakharov V.E. (2010) Nauka v Rossii i v sovremennom mire [Science in Russia and in the modern world] Neekonomicheskie grani ekonomiki: nepoznannoe vzaimovliyanie [Noneconomic Facets of Economy: Unknown Mutual Influence. Scientific and Publicistic Notes of Social Scientists. Bogomolov O., Kuzyk V. (eds)]. Moscow: Institut ekonomicheskikh strategi: 497–517. (In Russ.)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate