UNIVERSITIES’ RATINGS - IMPACT AND UNFORESSEN SIDE-EFFECTS
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
UNIVERSITIES’ RATINGS - IMPACT AND UNFORESSEN SIDE-EFFECTS
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000392-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Pages
71-80
Abstract
Impact of rating systems on European and national higher education is estimated analyzing unexpected side effects, which influence organizational behavior of universities. The rating system is defined as a form of international interaction, where it functions as a dominant behavior scenario, which no University can escape. This system and induced effects have become proxy measures of economic competitiveness of States, acquired symbolic value, based on which government makes decisions (for example, on financing). Then this symbolic meaning is loaded with meaning, not connected with reality and the essence of universities that can be considered as a postmodern shift.
Keywords
higher education, universities, ratings
Date of publication
01.08.2016
Number of purchasers
1
Views
464
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf Download JATS

References



Additional sources and materials

Barrow С.W. The strategy of selective excellence: redesigning higher education for global competition in postindustrial society // Higher Education. 1996. № 41. P. 447–469.

Busquin P. Presidency Conclusion (Lisbon European Council 23/24 March 2000). URL: http://www. consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/00100-r1.en0.htm (дата обращения: 08.02.2016).

Clarke M. Quality assessment. Lessons from Australia and New Zealand // Higher Education in Europe. 2005. № 30. P. 183–197.

Dill D. Convergence and diversity: the role and influence of university Rankings // University Rankings, Diversity and the New Landscape of Higher Education. 2009. P. 97–116.

Erkkila T. University rankings and European higher education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

Gornitzka A. Channel, filter or buffer? National policy responses to global rankings Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

Hazelkorn Е. Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education. The Battle for World-Class Excellence. Houndmills, Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.

Holzinger K., Knill C. Causes and conditions of cross-national policy convergence // Journal of European Policy. 2005. № 12. P. 775–796.

Locke W. The institutionalization of rankings: managing status anxiety in an increasingly marketized environment // University Rankings. Theoretical Basis, Methodology and Impacts on Global Higher Education. 2011. P. 201–228.

Maassen P., Stensaker B. The knowledge triangle, European higher education policy logics and policy implications // Higher Education. 2010. № 60. P. 1–13.

Marginson S., Van Der Wende M. To rank or to be ranked: the impact of global rankings in higher education // Journal of Studies in international Education. 2007. № 11. P. 306–329.

Mohrman K., Ma W., Baker D. The research university in transition: the emerging global model // Higher Education Policy. 2007. № 21. P. 5–27.

Morphew C.C., Swanson C. On the efficacy of raising your university’s ranking. University Rankings. Theoretical Basis, Methodology and Impacts on Global Higher Education. 2011. P. 185–199.

Rauhvargers A. Global University Rankings and Their Impact. Brussels: European University Association, 2011.

Salmi J., Saroyan A. League Tables as Policy Instruments: Uses and Misuses // Higher Education Management and Policy. 2007. Vol. 9. № 2. P. 31–68.

Teichler U. Social Contexts and Systemic Consequence of University Rankings: A Meta-Analysis of the Ranking Literature // University Rankings Theoretical Basis, Methodology and Impacts on Global Higher Education. 2011. P. 55–69.

Usher A., Medow J. A global survey of university rankings and league tables // University Rankings, Diversity, and the New Landscape of Higher Education, Global Perspectives on Higher Education. 2009. Vol. 18. P. 3–18.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate