CONCEPTUAL IDEAS OF MIXED METHODS RESEARCH: STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT AND CURRENT DEBATES
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
CONCEPTUAL IDEAS OF MIXED METHODS RESEARCH: STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT AND CURRENT DEBATES
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000392-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Pages
21-29
Abstract
This article explores the situation of mixed methods research (MMR) as a special strategy of combining several research methods. Changes in the conceptual frameworks since 1960th to present times concerned the concept of triangulation in the modes of research designs implementing combination and integration of qualitative and quantitative methods. The classification grounds for research design modelling proposed by J. Greene and his colleagues, A. Bryman and J. Cresswell are analyzed. Special ethical issues emerging from using of MMR are dicussed.
Keywords
mixed methods research, research design, multi-methods research, qualitative/quantitative methodology, pragmatism, knowledge integration, classification of methods
Date of publication
01.08.2016
Number of purchasers
1
Views
490
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf Download JATS

References



Additional sources and materials

Gotlib A.S. Social'no-ekonomicheskaya adaptaciya rossiyan: opyt sochetaniya kolichestvennoj i kachestvennoj metodologii v otdel'no vzyatom issledovanii // Sociologiya: metodologiya, metody, matematicheskoe modelirovanie. 2000. № 12. S. 5–24.

Demin A.N. O sovmeshchenii kolichestvennogo i kachestvennogo podhodov v issledovatel'skom cikle // Sociologiya: metodologiya, metody, matematicheskoe modelirovanie. 1999. № 11. S. 5–25.

Ipatova A.A. Naskol'ko razumna nasha vera v rezul'taty oprosov, ili Narushenie issledovatel'skoj etiki v sociologicheskih issledovaniyah // Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny. 2014. № 3(121). C. 26–39.

Kempbell D.T. Modeli eksperimentov v social'noj psihologii i prikladnyh issledovaniyah. M.: Progress, 1980.

Ocenka programm: metodologiya i praktika / Pod red. A.I. Kuz'mina, R. O’Sallivan, N.A. Koshelevoj. M.: Presto-RK, 2009.

Prava zhenshchin v Rossii: issledovanie real'noj praktiki ih soblyudeniya i massovogo soznaniya. M.: MCGI, MFF, 1998. T. 1; T. 2.

Procedury i metody sociologicheskogo issledovaniya. Praktikum. Kniga 2. Kachestvennoe sociologicheskoe issledovanie / Pod red. A.S. Gotlib. Samara, 2014.

Rabota i sem'ya v zhizni zhenshchin s det'mi-doshkol'nikami / Pod red. O.B. Savinskoj. M.: Variant, 2008.

Savinskaya O.B. Sub"ektivnost' v kachestvennom issledovanii: novye podhody // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. 2007. № 10. S. 122–131.

Semenova V.V. Strategii kombinacii kachestvennogo i kolichestvennogo podhodov pri izuchenii pokolenij // Inter: interakciya, interv'yu, interpretaciya. 2014. № 8. S. 5–15.

Stanovlenie trudovyh otnoshenij v postsovetskoj Rossii / Pod red. D. DeBardeleben, S. Klimovoj, V. Yadova. M.: Akademicheskij proekt, 2004.

Tatarova G.G. Metodologicheskaya travma sociologa. K voprosu integracii znaniya // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. 2006. № 9. S. 3–12.

Tereshchenko O.V. Metodologiya social'nyh issledovanij: vne kolichestvenno-kachestvennoj ritoriki // Sociologiya i obshchestvo: global'nye vyzovy i regional'noe razvitie [Elektronnyj resurs]: Materialy IV Ocherednogo Vserossijskogo sociologicheskogo kongressa / ROS, IS RAN, AN RB, ISPPI. M.: ROS, 2012. S. 8648–8654.

Bryman A. Quantitative and qualitative research: further reflections on their integration // Mixing methods: qualitative and quantitative research. Avebury, 1992.

Bryman A. Quantity and quality in social research. London: Routledge, 1988.

Bryman A. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative Research 2006. Vol. 6(1). P. 97–113.

Campbell D., Fiske D. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin. 1959. Vol. 56. № 2 (March). P. 81–105.

Campbell D.T. “Degrees of freedom” and the Case Study // Comparative political studies. 1975. Vol. 8. № 2. P. 178–193.

Creswell J. Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.

Creswell J. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mix method approaches. Sage: Thousand Oaks, Calif., 2009.

Creswell J.W., Plano Clark V.L. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2011.

Creswell J. Controversies in mixed methods research // The Sage handbook of qualitative research/ Ed. by N. Denzin. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 2011.

Denzin N. The research act: a theoretical introduction into sociological methods. NY: McGraw-Hill, 1970.

Fetters M.D., Freshwater D. Publishing a Methodological Mixed Methods Research Article // Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2015. Vol. 9. № 3. P. 203–213.

Greene J.C., Caracelli V.J., Graham W.F. Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs // Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 1989. Vol. 11. № 3. P. 255–274.

Hesse-Biber S., Johnson R. B. Coming at Things Differently Future Directions of Possible Engagement With Mixed Methods Research // Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2013. Vol. 7. № 2. P. 103–109.

Johnson R., Onwuegbuziu A., Turner L. Toward a definition of mixed method research // Journal of mixed method research. 2007. Vol. 1. № 2. R. 112–133.

Marti T.S., Mertens D.M. Mixed Methods Research with Groups at Risk New Developments and Key Debates // Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2014. Vol. 8. № 3. P. 207–211.

Morgan D.L. Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: A pragmatic approach. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 2014.

Tashakkori A., Teddlie Ch. Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1998.

Todd J. D. 1979. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action // Administrative Science Quarterly. 1979. Vol. 24. № 4 (December). P. 602–611.

Yin R.K. The Case Study Crisis: Some Answers Administrative Science Quarterly. 1981. Vol. 26. № 1. P. 58–65.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate