Regeneration of the nomenclature as a ruling social stratum in the post-soviet Russia
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Regeneration of the nomenclature as a ruling social stratum in the post-soviet Russia
Annotation
PII
S013216250000769-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Yuliy A. Nisnevich 
Occupation: Prof. of Department of Political Science
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Pages
143-152
Abstract

   This article provides insight into regeneration of nomenclature as the ruling social stratum of post-Soviet Russia after the revolutionary events of 1990. This type of political establishment is not a state bureaucracy or a meritocratic elite, but a social phenomenon generated and ontologically inherent in the Soviet political regimes. The process of regeneration of nomenclature started when the representatives of the Soviet nomencla­ture filled the structures of the new Russian government. "Privatization in the Russian style" contributed to the process and led to the formation of nomenclature-oligarchic clans. These clans and their struggle for power and resources form the basis of the vital activity of the Russian nomenklatura. During the second term of Boris Yeltsin's presidency, the process of "buying up the state" by nomencla­ture-oligarchic clans and incorporation of their representatives and lobbyists into executive and legislative power structures significantly intensified. Operation "successor," which brought Vladimir Putin to power in 2000, finalized the formation of the nomenklatura-oligarchic regime as the ruling regime in post-Soviet Russia and Russian nomenklatura as the dominant social stratum.

Keywords
nomenclature, elites, ruling social stratum, soviet heritage, post-soviet Russia
Received
07.10.2018
Date of publication
14.10.2018
Number of purchasers
10
Views
555
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Bol'shoj ehntsiklopedicheskij slovar'. M.: ACT, 2003.

2. Bor'ba s vetryanymi mel'nitsami? Sotsial'no-antropologicheskij podkhod k issledovaniyu korruptsii. SPb.: Apetejya, 2007.

3. Voslenskij M. Nomenklatura. M.: Zakharov, 2005.

4. Goldstoun D. K teorii revolyutsii chetvertogo pokoleniya//Logos. 2006. №5 (56). S.58-103.

5. Dzhilas M. Novyj klass // Dzhilas M. Litso totalitarizma. M.: Novosti, 1992. S.159-360.

6. El'tsin B.N. Prezidentskij marafon. Razmyshleniya, vospominaniya, vpechatleniya. M.: ACT, 2000.

7. Kryshtanovskaya O. Anatomiya rossijskoj ehlity. M.: Zakharov, 2005.

8. Levada Yu.A. Sochineniya: problema cheloveka. M.: Izd. Karpov E.V., 2011.

9. Nisnevich Yu.A. Politika i korruptsiya: korruptsiya kak faktor mirovogo politicheskogo protsessa. M.: Yurajt, 2017.

10. Olson M. Vlast' i protsvetanie: Pererastaya kommunisticheskie i kapitalisticheskie diktatury. M.: Novoe izdatel'stvo, 2012.

11. Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Vosstanie mass. M.: ACT, 2003.

12. Privatizatsiya po-rossijski / Kollektiv avtorov. M.: Vagrius, 1999.

13. Rossijskij statisticheskij ezhegodnik 2017. URL: http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/doc_2017/year/year17.pdf (data obrascheniya: 15.01.2018).

14. Safronov V. Otnoshenie k demokratii v Rossii: konets ehpokhi El'tsina // Teleskop: zhurnal sotsiologicheskikh i marketingovykh issledovanij. 2007. №3. S. 24-39.

15. Sovetskij prostoj chelovek. M.: Mirovoj okean, 1993.

16. Heilman J.S., Jones G., Kaufmann D. Seize the State, Seize the Day: State Capture, Corruption and Influence in Transition. World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper. 2000. № 2444. P.1-42.

17. Nisnevich Yu. A., Rozic P. Lustration Matters: a Radical Approach to the Problem of Corruption // Studies in Comparative International Development. 2016. Vol. 51. Iss. 3. P.257-285.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate