Везде

RAS Social ScienceСоциологические исследования Sotsialogicheski issledovania

  • ISSN (Print) 0132-1625
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-6010

Parental involvement in adult children’s lives

You can
PII
S0132162525030094-1
DOI
10.31857/S0132162525030094
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Tatiana A. Gurko
  • Occupation: Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Chief Researcher
  • Affiliation: Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue number 3
Pages
105-117
Abstract
According to the system approach, the balance of intimacy and autonomy in relationships with parents contributes to successful development of personality. In the context of the diversification of the family institution, the question of the structure impact by the parental family on the well-being of children, including adult children, remains relevant. The results of an online study of 500 residents of Moscow and the Moscow region, citizens aged 18–34 who are not married and have no children, are presented. Less than a third of the respondents live with their parents, and for the majority this is rather a forced option. According to two thirds of adult children, parents participate in their lives as much as they would like. However, one third of fathers are not involved enough in their children’s daily lives. Pressure, excessive control of mothers, imposition of their opinions, desire to dictate, misunderstandings, indifference and even infantilism of fathers were noted among the causes of conflicts. Disagreements with parents also arise in the normative sphere. Parents expect the marriage of adult children and the birth of grandchildren earlier than their children are ready for this. Living with their parents is an additional source of conflict for young women with their mothers, and for young men with their fathers. Subjective psychological well-being is operationalized in the context of hedonistic and eudaimonistic approaches. The indicator of subjective well-being is based on indicators of life satisfaction, locus of control and self-esteem. Statistically significantly more young women and men with low levels of well-being believe that their father is not involved enough in their daily lives. There were more young women with a low well-being index among those who lived only with their mother during the graduation period and did not know their father, and more young men with a low index among those who lived with their stepfathers during this period. The necessity of attracting state information and financial resources for the timely separation of adult children from their parents is substantiated.
Keywords
взрослые дети родители автономия совместное/раздельное проживание вовлеченность конфликт семейная структура благополучие
Date of publication
17.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
16

References

  1. 1. Валиев Р. А., Максимова Л. А., Стукова С. В., Каримова В. Г. Ожидания студентов СПО от взаимодействия с родителями как субъективный фактор межличностных отношений в семье // Педагогическое образование в России. 2021. № 3. С. 74–81. DOI: 10.26170/2079-8717_2021_03_08.
  2. 2. Васютенко Д. А., Алейникова Е. Д. Студенческая семья: отношение родителей студентов к созданию семьи во время учебы детей в вузе // Актуальные проблемы экспериментальной и клинической медицины: Сборник статей 81-й международной научно-практической конференции молодых ученых и студентов, Волгоград, 19–21 апреля 2023 года. Волгоград: Волгоградский государственный медицинский университет, 2023. С. 226–227.
  3. 3. Гурко Т. А. Вариативность представлений в сфере родительства // Социологические исследования. 2000. № 11. С. 90–97.
  4. 4. Гурко Т. А. Взаимоотношения родителей и взрослых детей: понятия для анализа // Социологические исследования. 2020. № 12. С. 105–115. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250009614-8.
  5. 5. Захаров С. В. История рождаемости в России: от поколения к поколению // Демографическое обозрение. 2023. Том. 10. № 1. С. 4–43. DOI: 10.17323/demreview.v10i1.17259.
  6. 6. Шевченко И. О. Сводные семьи: отношения и проблемы // Вестник РГГУ. Серия: философия, социология, искусствоведение. 2016. № 4. С. 61–68.
  7. 7. Allendorf K., Pandian R. K. The Decline of Arranged Marriage? Marital Change and Continuity in India // Population and Development Review. 2016. Vol. 42. No. 3. P. 435–464. DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2016.00149.x.
  8. 8. Bengtson V. L. Beyond the Nuclear Family: The Increasing Importance of Multigenerational Bonds // Journal of Marriage and Family. 2001. Vol. 63. No. 1. P. 1–16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00001.x.
  9. 9. Budinski M., Qu L., Baxter J. Young People Living with Parents. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies. 2023. URL: https://aifs.gov.au/research/facts-and-figures/young-people-living-parents (дата обращения: 21.12.2024).
  10. 10. Chen D., Tong Y. Marriage for the Sake of Parents? Adult Children’s Marriage Formation and Parental Psychological Distress in China // Journal of Marriage and Family. 2021. Vol. 83. No. 4. P. 1194–1211. DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12749.
  11. 11. De Falco A., Moracci E., Venturin A. Fleeing the Crowded Nest: Siblings and Leaving the Parental Home // European University Institute. 2023. URL: https://www.siepweb.it/siep/wp/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/8.EttaChiuri2023_DE-FALCO-MORACCI–VENTURIN_Fleeing-the-Crowded-Nest.pdf (дата обращения: 15.10.2024).
  12. 12. Esteve A., Boertien D., Mogi R., Lozano M. Moving out the Parental Home and Partnership Formation as Social Determinants of Low Fertility // Vienna Yearbook of Population Research. 2020. Vol. 18. P. 33– 37. DOI: 10.1553/populationyearbook2020.deb02.
  13. 13. Esteve A., Reher D. S. Rising Global Levels of Intergenerational Coresidence Among Young Adults // Population and Development Review. 2021. Vol. 47. No. 3. P. 691–717. DOI: 10.1111/padr.12427.
  14. 14. Fingerman K. L., Huo M., Birditt K. S. A Decade of Research on Intergenerational Ties: Technological, Economic, Political, and Demographic Changes // Journal of Marriage and Family. 2020. Vol. 82. No. 1. P. 383–403. DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12604.
  15. 15. Fry R. Young Adults in the U. S. Are Reaching Key Life Milestones Later than in the Past. Pew Research Center. 2023. URL: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/05/23/young-adults-in-the-u-s-are-reaching-key-life-milestones-later-than-in-the-past/ (дата обращения: 11.10.2024).
  16. 16. Lei L., South S. J. Who Returned Home? The COVID-19 Pandemic and Young Adults’ Residential Transitions // Advances in Life Course Research. Epub. 2023. Vol. 58. DOI: 10.1016/j.alcr.2023.100582.
  17. 17. Luppi F., Rosina A., Sironi E. Leaving and Returning to the Parental Home during COVID times in France, Italy, Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom // Demographic Research. 2024. Vol. 50. Article 3. P. 101–114. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2024.50.3/.
  18. 18. Minkin R., Parker K., Horowitz J., Aragao C. Parents, Young Adult Children and the Transition to Adulthood. Pew Research Center. 2024. URL: https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2024/01/25/parents-young-adult-children-and-the-transition-to-adulthood/ (дата обращения: 21.10.2024).
  19. 19. Pesando L. M., Barban N., Sironi M., Furstenberg F. F. A Sequence-Analysis Approach to the Study of the Transition to Adulthood in Low- and Middle-Income Countries // Population and Development Review. 2021. Vol. 47. No. 3. P. 719–747. DOI: 10.1111/padr.12425.
  20. 20. Thornton A. Leaving the Parental Home in Post-apartheid South Africa // Population, Space and Place. 2023, e2698. DOI: 10.1002/psp.2698.
  21. 21. Sanner C., Ganong L., Coleman M. Shared Children in Stepfamilies: Experiences Living in a Hybrid Family Structure // Journal of Marriage and Family. 2020. Vol. 82. No. 2. P. 605–621. DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12631.
  22. 22. Schwanitz K., Rampazzo F., Vitali A. Unpacking Intentions to Leave the Parental Home in Europe Using the Generations and Gender Survey // Demographic Research. 2021. Vol. 45. Article. 2. P. 17–54. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2021.45.2.
  23. 23. Settersten R., Ray B. What’s Going on with Young People today? The Long and Twisting Path to Adulthood // The Future of Children. 2010. Vol. 20. № 1. Р. 19–41.
  24. 24. van den Berg L., Kalmijn M., Leopold T. Explaining Cross-national Differences in Leaving Home // Population, Space and Place. 2021, e2476. DOI: 10.1002/psp.2476.
  25. 25. van Stee E. G. Parenting Young Adults Across Social Class: A Review and Synthesis // Sociology Compass. 2022. Vol. 16. No. 9. e13021. DOI: 10.1111/soc4.13021.
  26. 26. Wang Y., Tian F. Complex Nexus: Economic Development, Rural-to-urban Migration and Transition to Adulthood in China //Advances in Life Course Research. 2024. Vol. 62. DOI: 10.1016/j.alcr.2024.100633.
  27. 27. Wilkins R., Vera-Toscano E., Botha F., Dahmann S. The Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey: Selected Findings from Waves 1 to 19. Melbourne: University of Melbourne, 2021.
  28. 28. Zhang X., Sassler S. The Age of Independence, Revisited: Parents and Interracial Union Formation Across the Life Course. Sociological Forum. 2019. No. 34(2): 361–385. DOI: 10.1111/socf.12501.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library