References

Additional sources and materials

1. Vlastos G. The Third Man Argument in the «Parmenides» // Philos. Rev. 1954. V. 63. P. 319—349.

2. Sellars W. Vlastos and the Third Man // Ibid. 1955. V. 64. P. 405—438.

3. Taylor A. E. The Parmenides of Plato. Clarendon. 1934.

4. Cornford F. M. Plato and Parmenides. L., 1939.

5. Ross. W. D. Plato’s Theory of Ideas. O.xford. 1951.

6. Peck A. L. Plato’s Alleged Self-Criticism in the «Parmenides»: Some Recent Views // Procs. Cambr. Philol. Soc. 1952—1953. CLXXXH.

7. Vlastos G. A Reply to Mr. Sellars // Philos. Rev. 1955. V. 64. P. 439—449.

8. Geach P. The Third Man Again // Ibid. 1956. V. 65. P. 72—82.

9. Vlastos G. A Reply to Mr. Geach // Ibid. P. 83—95.

10. Allen R. E. Participation and Predication in Plato’s Middle Dialogues // Ibid. I960. V. 69. P. 147—164.

11. Peck A. L. Plato versus Parmenides // Ibid. 1962. V. 71.

12. Moravesik J. M. E. The «Third Man» Argument and Plato’s Theory of Forms // Phronesis. 1963. V. 8. P. 50—62.

13. Crombie J. M. An Examination of Plato’s Doctrines. Routledge and Kegan Paul. 1963.

14. Allen R. E. (ed.) Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics. L., 1965.

15. Rankin K. W. The Duplicity of Plato’s Third Man // Mind. 1969. LXXVIII.

16. Shiner R. Soli-Predication and the «Third Man» Argument//History Philos. 1970. V. 8.

17. Barford R. The Criticisms of tlie Theory of Forms in the First Part of Plato’s «Parmenides». Indiana. PhD, 1970.

18. Cohen M. The Logic of the Third Man // Philos. Rev. 1971. V. 80. P. 448—475.

19. Strang C. Plato and the Third Man, in [20], 1971.

20. Plato: Critical Essays / Ed. Vlaslos G. Doubleday, 1971.

21. Panagiotou S. Vlastos on «Parmenides» 132a 1—b2: Some of his text and logic // Philos. Quart. 1971. V. 21 P. 255—259.

22. Teloh N., Louzecky D. J. Plato’s Third Man Argument j j Phronesis. 1972. V. 17. P. 80—94.

23. Vlastos G. Platonic Studies. Princeton, 1973.

24. Clegg S. S. Self-Predication and Linguistic Reference in Plato's Theory of the Forms // Phronesis, 1973. V. XVIII. P. 26—43.

25. Wallace S. A Reasonable Self-Predication Premise for the Third Man Argument // Philos. Rev. 1973. V. 82.

26. Vlastos Cr. A Note on «Pauline Predications» in Plato // Phronesis. 1974. V. XIX. P. 95—101.

27. Cresswell M. J. Participation in Plato’s Parmenides // Southern J. Philos. 1975. V. 13.

28. Bestor T. W. Common Properties and Eponymy in Plato // Philos. Quart. 1978. V. 28. (112). P. 189—207.

29. Bestor T. W. Plato’s semantics and Plato’s «Parmenides» // Phronesis. 1980. V. 25. P. 38—75.

30. Malcolm J. Semantics and Self-Predication in Plato // Phronesis. 1981. V. XXVI. P. 286—294.

31. Allen R. E. Plato’s «Parmenides» Translation and Analysis. Oxford, 1983.

32. Sternfeld R., Zyskind I. Meaning Relation and Existence in Plato’s «Parmenides». N. Y., 1987.

33. Penner T. The Asccnl from Nominalism Some Existence Arguments in Plato’s Middle Dialogues. D. Reidel Publ. Co., 1987.