N. COFFEE. THE COMMERCE OF WAR: EXCHANGE AND SOCIAL ORDER IN LATIN EPIC. CHICAGO-LONDON, 2009
N. COFFEE. THE COMMERCE OF WAR: EXCHANGE AND SOCIAL ORDER IN LATIN EPIC. CHICAGO-LONDON, 2009
Аннотация
Код статьи
S0321-03910000392-7-1
Тип публикации
Статья
Статус публикации
Опубликовано
Страницы
206-211
Аннотация
Вестник древней истории, N. COFFEE. THE COMMERCE OF WAR: EXCHANGE AND SOCIAL ORDER IN LATIN EPIC. CHICAGO-LONDON, 2009
Классификатор
Дата публикации
01.04.2011
Всего подписок
1
Всего просмотров
539
Оценка читателей
0.0 (0 голосов)
Цитировать   Скачать pdf

Библиография



Дополнительные библиографические источники и материалы

Ahl F.M. 1986: Statius’ ‘Thebaid’: A Reconsideration // ANRW. II. 32. 5, 2803–2912.

Anzinger S. 2007: Schweigen im römischen Epos: Zur Dramaturgie der Kommunikation bei Vergil, Lucan, Valerius Flaccus und Statius. B.–N.Y.

Bandera C. 1994: The Sacred Game: The Role of the Sacred in the Genesis of Modern Literary Fiction. University Park (PA).

Bartsch S. 1997: Ideology in Cold Blood: A Reading of Lucan’s Civil War. Cambr. (Mass.)–L.

Bernstein N.W. 2009: Rev.: N. Coffee. The Commerce of War: Exchange and Social Order in Latin Epic. Chicago, 2009 // BMCR. 2009. 11. 11.

Berti E. 2004: Aspetti del moralismo nell’epica di Lucano // Lucano e la tradizione dell’epica latina / P. Esposito, E.M. Ariemma (eds.). Napоli, 69–84.

Coffee N. 2006: Eteocles, Polynices, and the Economics of Violence in Statius’ Thebaid // AJPh. 127, 415–452.

Coffee N. 2009: Statius’ Theseus: Martial or Merciful? // CPh. 104, 221–228.

Dominik W.J. 1994: The Mythic Voice of Statius: Power and Politics in the Thebaid. Leiden–New York– Köln.

Feeney D.C. 1991: The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxf.

Galinsky K. 1988: The Anger of Aeneas // AJPh. 109, 321–348.

Ganiban R.T. 2007: Statius and Vergil: The Thebaid and the Reinterpretation of the Aeneid. Cambr.

Hardie P.R. 1993: The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition. Cambr.

Hardie P.R. 2002: Ovid’s Poetics of Illusion. Cambr.

Heinrich J.N. 1999: Longa Retro Series: Sacrifi ce and Reception in Statius’ Menoeceus Episode // Arethusa. 32, 165–196.

Hershkowitz D. 1998: The Madness of Epic: Reading Insanity from Homer to Statius. Oxf.

Keith A. 2000: Engendering Rome: Women in Latin Epic. Cambr.

La Penna A. 1971: Spunti sociologici per l’interpretazione dell’Eneide // Vergiliana: Recherches sur Virgile / H. Bardon, R. Verdière (eds). Leiden, 283–293.

Laird A. 1999: Powers of Expression, Expressions of Power: Speech Presentation and Latin Literature. Oxf.

Leigh M. 1997: Lucan: Spectacle and Engagement. Oxf.

Marti B.M. 1945: The Meaning of the Pharsalia // AJPh. 66, 352–376.

Masters J. 1992: Poetry and Civil War in Lucan’s ‘Bellum Civile’. Cambr.–N.Y. e. a.

McGuire D.T. 1997: Acts of Silence: Civil War, Tyranny, and Suicide in the Flavian Epics. Hildesheim– Zürich–New York.

McNelis C. 2007: Statius’ Thebaid and the Poetics of Civil War. Cambr.

Morris I. 1994: The Athenian Economy Twenty Years after ‘The Ancient Economy’ // CPh. 89, 351–366.

Narducci E. 1999: Deconstructing Lucan: Ovvero le nozze (coi fi chi secchi) di Ermete Trismegisto e di Filologia // Interpretare Lucano / P. Esposito, L. Nicastri (eds.). Napoli, 39–86.

Newlands C. 2002: Statius’ Silvae and the Poetics of Empire. Cambr.

O’Gorman E. 2005: Beyond Recognition: Twin Narratives in Statius’ Thebaid // Roman and Greek Imperial Epic / M. Paschalis (ed.). Herakleion, 29–45.

Pagán V.E. 2002: The Mourning After: Statius Thebaid 12 // AJPh. 121, 423–452.

Putnam M.C.J. 1999: The Hesitation of Aeneas // Virgil: Critical Assessments of Classical Authors / P.R. Hardie (ed.). Vol. 4. L., 414–433.

Quint D. 1993: Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic Form from Virgil to Milton. Princeton.

Richlin A. 1992: Reading Ovid’s Rapes // Pornography and Representation in Greece and Rome / A. Richlin (ed.). N.Y.–Oxf., 158–179.

Roller M.B. 2001: Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome. Princeton.

Seewald M. 2002: Lucan. 9, 1–604: Ein Kommentar. Göttingen.

Smith R.A. 2005: The Primacy of Vision in Virgil’s Aeneid. Austin.

Vessey D.W.T.C. 1973: Statius and the Thebaid. Cambr.

Wick C. 2004: M. Annaeus Lucanus. Bellum civile. Liber IX: Kommentar. München–Leipzig

Комментарии

Сообщения не найдены

Написать отзыв
Перевести