Везде
VOZRASTNAIA DIFFERENTSIATSIIA U DREVNIKH TIURKOV VI-X VV.: OPYT KOMPLEKSNOGO ANALIZA [AGE DIFFERENTIATION AMONG THE ANCIENT TURKS OF THE 6TH- 10TH CENTURIES: AN ATTEMPT AT A COMPLEX ANALYSIS]
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
VOZRASTNAIA DIFFERENTSIATSIIA U DREVNIKH TIURKOV VI-X VV.: OPYT KOMPLEKSNOGO ANALIZA [AGE DIFFERENTIATION AMONG THE ANCIENT TURKS OF THE 6TH- 10TH CENTURIES: AN ATTEMPT AT A COMPLEX ANALYSIS]
Annotation
PII
S0869-54150000392-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Vladimir V. Tishin 
ORCID: 0000-0001-7344-0996
Nikolai Seregin
ORCID: 0000-0002-8051-7127
Edition
Issue 1
Pages
136-152
Abstract
The article examines a broad range of archaeological and written sources, drawing on comparative historical, ethnographic, and folklore materials, to evaluate and summarize the available data on the age differentiation among the ancient Turks of the 6th-10th centuries. The authors argue that there may be pinpointed four distinct age categories, whose members must have differed in regard to their social functions
Keywords
Ancient Turks, age differentiation, social structure, Central Asia, written sources, archaeological materials
Number of purchasers
1
Views
601
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

EDT -Clauson G. An Etymological Dictionary of Pre-Thirteenth-Century Turkish. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972. 
Ein turkisch-arabisches Glossar 1894 -Ein turkisch-arabisches Glossar, nach der Leidener Handschrift/Hrsg. und erlautert von M.Th. Houtsma. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1894. 
Kitabi-Dsds Qorqud 2004 -Kitabi-Dsds Qorqud. Osil vs sadsls§dirilmi§ mstinlsr/Tsrtib edsni: S. Olizads. Baki: Ondsr ns§riyyat, 2004. 
MK I-III -Divanu Lfigat-it-Turk ve Tercumesi/Cev. B. Atalay. Cilt I-III. Ankara: Turk Tarih Kurumu Basimevi, 1985. 
Radloff W. Die Altturkischen Inschriften der Mongolei. III. Lief. St. Petersburg: Kaiserlische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1895.
Aydin E. §ine Usu Yaziti. Corum: KaraM Yayinlari, 2007. 
Bazin L. Les calendriers turcs anciens et medievaux. Lille: Universite de Lille, 1974. 
Caferoglu A. Eski Uygur Turkfesi Sozlugu. istanbul: Turk Dil Kurumu Yayinlari, 1968. 
Dobrovits2010 -Dobrovits M. Otuz Oglan Sagdiflari Eski Bir Yazitin Bize Ogrettikleri//I. Uluslararasi Uzak Asya'dan On Asya'ya Eski Turkfe Bilgi Soleni, 18-20 Kasim 2009. Afyonkarahisar, 2010. S. 67-74. 
Erdal M. Old Turkic Word Formation: A Functional Approach to the Lexicon. Vol. I. Wiesbaben: Otto Harrassowitz, 1991. 
Gabain A. (von) Inhalt und magische Bedeutung der altturkischen Inschriften//Anthropos. 1953. Bd. 48. H. 3/4. S. 537-556. 
Golden P.B. The Terminology of Slavery and Servitude in Medieval Turkic//Studies on Central Asian History in Honor of Yuri Bregel/Ed. D. DeWeese. Bloomington, Ind.: Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies, 2001. P. 27-56. 
Karayev O. Kirgizlarin Ortaya Ciki§i -“Kirgiz” Terimi Hakkinda//Manas Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2001. Cilt 1. Sayi 1. S. 201-217. 
Li Yong-Song 1999 -Li Yong-Song. Turk Dillerinde Akrabalik Adlari. istanbul: Simurg, 1999. 
Maenchen-Helfen 1973 -Maenchen-Helfen O.J. The World of the Huns: Studies in Their History and Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973. 
Moravcsik Gy. Byzantinoturcica. 3. unveranderte Auflage. Bd. II. Sprachreste der Turkvolker in den byzantinischen Quellen. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1983. 
Moriyasu T. Site and Inscription of Sine Usu//Provisional Report of Researches on Historical Sites and Inscriptions in Mongolia from 1996 to 1998/Ed. by T. Moriyasu, A. Ochir. Toyonaka: The Society of Central Eurasian Studies, Osaka University, 1999. P. 177-195. 
Rybatzki V Die Personennamen und Titel der Mittelmongolischen Dokumente. Eine lexikalische Untersuchung. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino Oy, 2006. 
Sertkaya O.F. Tonyokuk abidesi uzerine uf not//Turkiyat Mecmuasi. 1980. Cilt XIX. 1977-1979. S. 165-182. 
Tekin T. Orhon Turkfesi Grameri. 2. bk. istanbul: Turk Dilli Ara§tirmalari, 2003. 
Tishin V. On the Term daguan of Chinese Sources on the Early Turkic History (in View of the One Hypothesis of ibrahim Kafesoglu)//Dil Ara§tirmalari. 2014. Sayi 15. S. 39-51

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate