RAS Social ScienceСоциологические исследования Sotsialogicheski issledovania

  • ISSN (Print) 0132-1625
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-6010

O CHEM MOLCHAT VESHCHI [WHAT THINGS CONCEAL]

PII
S0869-54150000392-4-1
DOI
10.7868/S50000392-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue 5
Pages
25-39
Abstract
The article discusses the ethnographic approaches to the study of material culture and the place they have taken within the material turn that has been observed in sociology. The questioning of material objects, which became increasingly popular in the humanities in the 1980s, albeit revolutionary, was no novelty for anthropology. For the latter, it rather meant the return to the original understanding of ethnographic knowledge as knowledge first and foremost about things. Nonetheless, even today, approaching material culture in the conservative vein remains dominant in anthropology; and one can hardly expect that anthropologists are going to follow sociologists in acknowledging the equality of the subject and the object - the human being and the thing - in their rights. However, where anthropological approaches to the study of material objects are potentially innovative today is in inquiring into the ways the objects are physically embodied. It is in this area, where the competence of sociology wanes, that anthropology can still make a strong point.
Keywords
Item, research of material culture, Museum Ethnography, sociology, representation, ethnographic subject, technology, semantics, aesthetic interpretation
Date of publication
18.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
1
Views
817

References

QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library