Везде
ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ МИКРОТРАСОЛОГИЧЕСКОГО АНАЛИЗА ОРУДИЙ ИЗ ЗЕРНИСТЫХ И КРИСТАЛЛИЧЕСКИХ ПОРОД
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ МИКРОТРАСОЛОГИЧЕСКОГО АНАЛИЗА ОРУДИЙ ИЗ ЗЕРНИСТЫХ И КРИСТАЛЛИЧЕСКИХ ПОРОД
Annotation
PII
S0869-60630000414-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Ksenia Stepanova  O. Zagorodnyaya
Edition
Issue 2
Pages
67-71
Abstract
In functional attribution of ancient tools, microtraceology is usually used for fl int artifacts, and macrotraceology for tools of granular rock. The present article analyzes the use of microtraceology for tools made of granular and crystalline rock. The study is based on type assemblages of tools; part of the experiments has been conducted by the authors (fi g. 1). The results confi rm the potential of the method, revealing changes in the surface of the tools and allowing to identify some of the materials they were applied to (fi gs. 2-4). The method has certain limitations which are related to the nature of the initial raw materials.
Keywords
Date of publication
01.04.2012
Number of purchasers
1
Views
513
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Girya E.Yu., Dehvlet E.G. Nekotorye rezul'taty razrabotki metodiki izucheniya tekhniki vypolneniya petroglifov piketazhem // Ural'skij istorich. vestn. 2010. № 1 (26).
 Ris. 4. Mikrosledy na ehksperimental'nykh orudiyakh iz zernistykh porod: a – estestvenno okatannaya (iskhodnaya) poverkhnost', ehtalon № 23 iz ehksperimental'noj kollektsii IIMK RAN, uvelichenie ×200; b – poverkhnost', kotoraya ispol'zovalas' dlya abrazivnoj obrabotki kosti, ehtalon № 23 iz ehksperimental'noj kollektsii IIMK RAN, uvelichenie ×200.
 Grichan Yu.V. Novye aspekty paleoehkonomiki v pozdnepaleoliticheskikh pamyatnikakh Zabajkal'ya (po materialam poseleniya Varvarina Gora) // Chelovek i prostranstvo v kul'ture kamennogo veka Evrazii. Novosibirsk, 2006.
 Korobkova G.F. Kamennye i kostyanye orudiya iz ehneoliticheskikh poselenij yuzhnoj Turkmenii // Izv. AN Turkmenskoj SSR. Vyp. 3. Ashkhabad, 1964 (Ser. Obschestv. nauki).
 Korobkova G.F. Primenenie metoda mikroanaliza k izucheniyu funktsij kamennykh i kostyanykh orudij // Arkheologiya i estestvennye nauki. L., 1965 (MIA; № 129).
 Korobkova G.F. Ehksperimental'no-trasologicheskie razrabotki kak kompleksnoe issledovanie v arkheologii // Ehksperimental'no-trasologicheskie issledovaniya v arkheologii. SPb., 1994.
 Korobkova G.F., Schelinskij V.E. Metodika mikromakroanaliza drevnikh orudij truda. Ch. 1. SPb., 1996.
 Semenov S.A. Pervobytnaya tekhnika (Opyt izucheniya drevnejshikh orudij i izdelij po sledam raboty). M.; L., 1957 (MIA; № 54).
 Adams J., Delgado S., Dubreuil L. et al. Functional analysis of Macro-Lithic Artefacts: A Focus on Working Surfaces // Non-Flint Raw Material Use in Prehistory. Old prejudices and new directions: Procedings of XV World Congress of the Intern. Union for Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences. V. 11. L., 2009 (BAR; Intern. Ser. 1939).
 Davis K.M. A preliminary study of the Ground Stone Tools from Muweilah, Sharjah Emirate, United Arab Emirates // Arabian archaeology and epigraphy. 1998. V. 9.
 de Beaune S.A. Essai d’une classification typologique des galets et plaquettes utilisés au Paléolithique // Gallia Préhistoire. Fouilles et monuments archéologiques en Françe Métropolitaine. 1989. T. 31.
 Dubreuil L. Long-term trends in Natufian subsistence: a usewear analysis of ground stone tools // JAS. 2004. V. 31.
 Hamon C., Plisson H. Functional analysis of grinding stones: The blinding-test contribution // Prehistoric Technology “40 years later”: Functional studies and the Russian legacy held in Verona (Italy), 20−30 April 2005. L., 2008 (BAR; Intern. Ser. 1783).

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate