Additional sources and materials
1. Sm.: Nijboer J.F. The law of evidence in criminal cases (the Netherlands) // Forensic expertise and the law of evidence / Ed. by J.F. Nijboer, C.R. Callen, N. Kwak. Amsterdam, 1993. P. 63-66; Roberts P., Zuckerman A. Criminal evidence. 2nd ed., Oxford, 2010. P. 96.
2. Sm.: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF "O nekotorykh voprosakh primeneniya sudami Konstitutsii Rossijskoj Federatsii pri osuschestvlenii pravosudiya" ot 31 oktyabrya 1995 № 8 (v red. ot 16 aprelya 2013 g.) // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 1996. № 1.
3. V ugolovnom protsesse SShA otnosimoe dokazatel'stvo priznaetsya dopustimym, esli inoe ne predusmotreno Konstitutsiej, federal'nymi statutami ili resheniyami Verkhovnogo suda SShA.
4. Avtor ne stavit tseli rassmotret' vse pravila ob isklyuchenii dokazatel'stv v silu ogranichennogo ob'ema nastoyaschej stat'i.
5. Sm.: st. 402 FPD SShA; Kampen P.T.C. Expert Evidence Compared: rules and practices in the Dutch and American criminal justice system. Antwerpen, 1998. P. 188; Hodgkinson T. Expert evidence: law and practice. London, 1990. P. 5; Macphail Y.D. Scottish criminal evidence: procedure and practice. P. 11 // http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ macphailevidence/procedure_and_practice
Comments
No posts found