Normativnaia model povedeniia sudei i osobennosti sudebnogo usmotreniia v Rossii
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Normativnaia model povedeniia sudei i osobennosti sudebnogo usmotreniia v Rossii
Annotation
PII
S1026-94520000616-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Edition
Pages
26-33
Abstract
In article the standard behavior model of judges which should be distinguished from empirical model is studied. The standardmodel of adoption of judgments – and is meant “behavior of judges” adoption of judgments – leaves the judge in privatewith the text of the law, the produced evidence and own internal belief. Except the text of the law at the disposal of judgesthere are decisions and resolutions of the supreme courts, ready decisions on similar affairs and other similar documentscontaining interpretation of laws and facilitating their application. But they don’t contain the decision on guilt of the defendantor correctness of the parties. The moral values of the personality created at the law enforcement official are the necessary limitlimiting application of a judicial discretion. In the course of permission of concrete dispute the court carries out a behaviorassessment taking into account own ideas of morality and the created values. Thus, to moral categories as to a limit of a judicialdiscretion, the subjective character dependent on the judge’s values is inherent. Such categories as “justice”, “expediency”,“rationality”, “conscientiousness”, “morality”, to some extent have subjective character.
Keywords
standard behavior model of the judge, judicial discretion, judicial precedent, judgment, right application, morality, expediency, judicial authority, judicial ethics, law
Date of publication
01.03.2017
Number of purchasers
4
Views
1388
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Ermakova K.P. Ponyatie i sub'ektivnye predely sudebnogo usmotreniya // Zhurnal ross. prava. 2009. № 8 (152). 

2. Sud, sudebnaya vlast': genezis i ehvolyutsiya // http://isfic.info/court/cohis01.htm

3. Var'yash I. Mudekhary v Aragone XIV-XV vekov. Nekotorye aspekty sudebnoj praktiki // Pravo v srednevekovom mire. Sb. st. Vyp. 2-3. SPb., 2001. S. 82.

4. Kotlyarevskij S.A. Istoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenij XVIII-XIX vv. M., 1911.

5. Pligin V.N. Razvitie sistemy sudoustrojstva v Rossijskoj Federatsii // Stenogramma lektsii, posvyaschyonnoj 20-letiyu Konstitutsii Rossijskoj Federatsii, istorii rossijskogo konstitutsionalizma. M., 2013. S. 18.

6. Baskova A.Yu. Doverie k sudebnym organam kak odno iz uslovij osuschestvleniya pravosudiya // Sb. materialov Vseross. konf., posvyaschennoj 20-letiyu dejstviya v Rossii Zakona "O statuse sudej v Rossijskoj Federatsii" i 75-letiyu so dnya obrazovaniya Vologodskogo oblastnogo suda" (g. Vologda, 17 oktyabrya 2012 g.). Vologda, 2012.

7. Kodeks chesti sud'i // http://zakon.kuban.ru/private/kchs.htm

8. Kodeks sudejskoj ehtiki, 2004 // http://www.kadis.ru/texts/index.phtml?id=6816&PrintVersion=1

9. Kornev A.V. Svoboda sudebnogo usmotreniya: ot proshlogo k sovremennosti // Yurid. tekhnika. 2011. № 5.

10. Muromtsev S.A. Iz lektsij po russkomu grazhdanskomu pravu. SPb., 1899. S. 3, 4.

11. Amosov S. Formirovanie vnutrennego ubezhdeniya // Pravosudie v Vostochnoj Sibiri. 2003. № 4 (12) // http://www.law.edu.ru/doc/document.asp?docID=1161818

12. Vaum L. The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor, 1997. P. 2.

13. Pritchett H. The Divided Supreme Court, 1944-1945 // Michigan Law Review. 1945. Vol. 44. № 3. P. 427-442

14. The Roosevelt Court: A Study in Judicial Politics and Values 1937-1947. N.Y., 1948;

15. Schubert G. Quantitative Analysis of Judicial Behavior. Glencoe: Free Press, 1959;

16. Judicial Behavior: A Reader in Theory and Research / Ed. by G. Schubert. Chicago, 1964

17. Shubert G. The Judicial Mind: The Attitudes and Ideologies of Supreme Court Justices, 1946-1963. Evanston, 1965.


18. Lyublinskij P. Sudebno-protsessual'naya reforma v Anglii 1925 g. // Sov. pravo. 1926. № 5. S. 86-103.

19. Aparova T.V. Sudy i sudebnyj protsess Velikobritanii. Angliya, Uehl's, Shotlandiya. M., 1996.

20. Kross R. Pretsedent v anglijskom prave. M., 1985. S. 28.

21. Aparova T.V. Pretsedent v sovremennom anglijskom prave i sudebnoe pravotvorchestvo // Trudy VNIISZ. Vyp. 6. 1976. S. 173-185.

22. Soprotivlenie novomu Ugolovnomu kodeksu i Ugolovno-protsessual'nomu kodeksu okazalos' takim zhestkim, chto delo dokhodilo do pryamogo sabotazha. Interv'yu s E. Mizulinoj // Ross. gaz. 2005. 8 fevr. // http://www.rg.ru/2005/02/08/upk.html

23. Gudkov L., Dubin B., Zorkaya N. Rossijskaya sudebnaya sistema v mneniyakh obschestva // Vestnik obschestvennogo mneniya. Dannye. Analiz. Diskussii. 2010. № 4. S. 16.

24. Kollinz R. Sotsiologicheskaya intuitsiya. Vvedenie v neochevidnuyu sotsiologiyu // Lichnostno-orientirovannaya sotsiologiya. M., 2004. S. 519.

25. Gudkov L., Dubin B., Zorkaya N. Ukaz. soch. S. 7-43; Otsenka raboty rossijskikh sudov. 2011. 12-13 marta.

26. Solomon Jr.P.H. Improving Russian Justice with Foreign Assistance: Model Courts and the Tactical Approach // Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 23 (3). 2010. P. 437-462.

27. Filosofskij ehntsiklopedicheskij slovar'. M., 1989. S. 730.

28. Aseev V.T. Motivatsiya povedeniya i formirovanie lichnosti. M., 1976. S. 15.

29. Platonov K.K. Kratkij slovar' sistemy psikhologicheskikh ponyatij. M., 1984. S. 164.

30. Kratkij filosofskij slovar' / Pod red. A.P. Alekseeva. M, 1997. S. 255.

31. Aver'yanova M.V. Zaschita dobrosovestnogo priobretatelya v rossijskom grazhdanskom prave. Avtoref. diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2001.

32. Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF «Po khodatajstvu MNS RF "O raz'yasnenii Postanovleniya Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 12 oktyabrya 1998 g. № 24-P"» ot 25 iyulya 2001 g. // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2001. № 32. St. 3410.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate