Везде
Ethics and metaphysics: On interaction between them
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Ethics and metaphysics: On interaction between them
Annotation
PII
S2072-07260000616-6-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Konstantin Frolov 
Edition
Volume 13 Issue 1
Pages
69-79
Abstract
The paper aims to analyze some aspects of the interaction between ethics and meta­physics as separate parts of philosophical knowledge. A good example of this kind of in­teraction can be found in case of moral criticism of D. Lewis’s modal realism. The study has two aims. On the one hand, the author aims to show how effective and convincing moral argument can be against some metaphysical theory. On the other hand, there are several arguments against the idea to rely on moral arguments when one chooses between competing metaphysical theories. These arguments are presented and analyzed. In con­clusion the author points at some problematic aspects of the relations between ethics and metaphysics.
Keywords
metaphysics, ethics, modal realism, possible worlds, abstract objects, Lewis
Date of publication
01.03.2020
Number of purchasers
22
Views
594
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials


 Apresyan R.G. Fenomen universal'nosti v ehtike: formy kontseptualizatsii // Voprosy filosofii. 2016. № 8. S. 79‒88.
 Vitgenshtejn L. Logiko-filosofskij traktat / Per. s nem. I.S. Dobronravova, D.G. Lakhuti. M.: Kanon+, 2017. 288 c.
 Lisanyuk E.N., Mazurova M.R. Argumentatsiya, raznoglasie ravnykh i rozhdenie istiny v spore // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science / Ehpistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2019. T. 56. № 1. S. 81‒100.
 Loginov E.V. Analiz diskussii o printsipe universalizuemosti v moral'noj filosofii 1970‒1980-kh gg. // Filosofskie nauki. 2018. № 10. S. 65‒80.
 Skomorokhov A.V. Metafizika kak osnova moral'noj filosofii: sostoyanie i vozmozhno­sti // Ehticheskaya mysl' / Ethical Thought. 2018. T. 18. № 1. S. 124‒129.
 Beedle A. Modal fatalism // The Philosophical Quarterly. 1996. Vol. 46 (185). P. 488‒495.
 Bricker P. The Relation between General and Particular: Entailment vs. Supervenience // Oxford Papers in Metaphysics. Vol. 3 / Ed. by D. Zimmerman. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. P. 251‒287.
 Gewirth A. Ethical Universalism and Particularism // The Journal of Philosophy. 1988. Vol. 85. P. 283‒302.
 Heller M. The immorality of Modal Realism, or: How I learned to stop worrying and let the children drown // Philosophical Studies. 2003. Vol. 114. P. 1‒22.
 Kane R. Free Will: the Elusive Ideal // Philosophical Studies. 1994. Vol. 75. P. 25‒60.
 Lewis D. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986. 288 p.
 Lowe E.J. Personal Agency: The Metaphysics of Mind and Action. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2008. 240 p.
 Parfit D. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984. 598 p.
 Plantinga A. The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974. 270 p.
 Roca-Royes S. Genuine Modal Realism, the Humean thesis and advanced modalizing // Synthese. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s11229‒018‒1728‒5.
 Schechtman M. Personal Identity and the Past // Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology. 2005. Vol. 12. P. 9‒22.
 Walsh D. Ethics and Metaphysics // International Journal of Ethics. 1936. Vol. 46 (4). P. 461‒472.
 
 Wittgenstein, L. Logiko-filosofskii traktat [Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus], trans. by I.S. Dobronravov and D.G. Lakhuti. Moscow: Kanon+ Publ., 2017. 288 pp. (In Russian)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate