- PII
- S30346010S0132162525090024-1
- DOI
- 10.7868/S3034601025090024
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume / Issue number 9
- Pages
- 14-22
- Abstract
- The issue of human essence is addressed. To be more accurate, the issue of its social constituent. It is related, so the author, to two other constituents, a natural one and an existential one, and does not always dominate in endeavors of an individual's self. The starting point of discussions is a thesis advanced by K. Marx with a relational (appellation to the system of relations) approach to the interpretation of an essential characteristic of human being found in his works. By critically taking this attitude as an exhaustive one, the author ranks public relations as those of a lower range compared to kinship. It is exactly the kinship as a valuable positive spontaneity that differs both from totality, and a comprehensive system of relations mediated a priori is deemed a nucleus of a human essence's social constituent. However, it's unfeasible to extrapolate kinship to all sociality of a human being. As a rule, it's exactly in relations that an individual has with the public. G. Bataille's attempt of sanctifying relations is assessed ambivalently. Only perceiving the "sacral sociology" without unconditional hegemony of relationalism and mediation provides adherence to the kinship idea and its thorough understanding. The author states and explains a paradoxical composition of the kinship and system of relations – a composition forming the sociality of a human being.
- Keywords
- сущность человека социальная компонента человеческой сущности система отношений тотальность близость К. Марка Ж. Багай «сакральная социология»
- Date of publication
- 08.12.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 29
References
- 1. Альтюссер Л. За Маркса / Пер. с фр. А. В. Денежкина. М.: Пражсис, 2006. @@Althusser L. For Marx. Transl. from Fr. by A. V. Denezhkin. Moscow: Praksis. (In Russ.)
- 2. Батай Ж., Пеньо К. (Лаура). Сакральное / Пер. с фр. О. Волчек. Kolonna Publications, 2001. @@Bataille G., Peignot C. (Laure). The Sacred. Transl. from Fr. by O. Volchek. Kolonna Publications. (In Russ.)
- 3. Гуревич П. Расколотость человеческого бытия. М.: ИФ РАН, 2009. @@Gurevich P. The Split of Human Being. Moscow: IF RAN. (In Russ.)
- 4. Коллеж социологии / Пер. с фр. под ред. В. Ю. Быстрова. СПб.: Наука, 2004. @@The College of Sociology. Trans. from Fr. by V. Yu. Bystrov et al. St. Petersburg: Nauka. (In Russ.)
- 5. Лифшиц Мих. Что такое классика? Онтогносеология. Смысл мира. «Истинная середина». М.: Искусство XXI век, 2004. @@Lifshitz Mikh. What is a Classic? Ontognosiology. The Sense of the Word. "The True Middle". Moscow: Iskusstvo XXI vek. (In Russ.)
- 6. Маркс К. Тезисы о Фейербахе // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. Изд. 2-е. М.: Госполитиза, 1955. Т. 3. С. 1–4. @@Marx K. Theses on Feuerbach. In: Marx K., Engels F. Works. Moscow: Gospolitizdat. Vol. 3: 1–4. (In Russ.)
- 7. Маркс К. Экономическо-философские рукописи 1844 года // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Из ранних произведений. М.: Госполитиздат, 1956. С. 517–642. @@Marx K. Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. In: Marx K., Engels F. Early Works. Moscow: Gospolitizdat.: 517–642. (In Russ.)
- 8. Маркузе Г. Критическая теория общества. Избранные работы по философии и социальной критике / Пер. с англ. А. А. Юдина. М.: АСТ: Астрель, 2011. @@Marcuse H. The Essential Marcuse. Trans. from Eng. by A. A. Yudin. Moscow: AST: Astrel. (In Russ.)
- 9. Тённис Ф. Общность и общество. Основные понятия чистой социологии / Пер. с нем. Д. В. Складнева. М.: Ф-д Университет: СПб.: В. Даль, 2002. @@Tönnies F. Community and Society. Trans. from Germ. by D. V. Sklyadnev. Moscow: F-d Universitet: St. Petersburg: V. Dal. (In Russ.)
- 10. Фатенков А. Н. Цифровое общество: цивилизация на стадии «комфортной» тоталитарности // Век глобализации. 2022. № 1(41). С. 72–85. @@Fatenkov A. N. Digital Society: Civilization at the Stage of "Comfortable" Totalitarianism. Vek globalizatsii [Century of Globalization]. No. 1(41): 72–85. (In Russ.)
