- PII
- S30346010S0132162525100132-1
- DOI
- 10.7868/S3034601025100132
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume / Issue number 10
- Pages
- 155-161
- Abstract
- This paper presents a comparative analysis of survey results on the political attitudes of university students in Kazakhstan (N = 616) and Turkey (N = 414), with a particular focus on how perceptions of democracy reflect different degrees of youth engagement in political processes. The findings reveal significant differences in levels of trust in democratic institutions, shaped by the distinct historical paths of the two Turkic-speaking countries. Turkish youth demonstrate a firm commitment to democratic values but also express considerable dissatisfaction with the existing political system. In contrast, Kazakhstani youth show less interest in democratic practices but greater loyalty to current political arrangements. These results illustrate that even "brotherly nations" can differ markedly in their political culture – an important consideration for sociologists in various countries, including Russia.
- Keywords
- Казахстан Турция политические ценности демократия молодежь политическая система политическая культура
- Date of publication
- 01.10.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 4
References
- 1. Жампетова А. О., Атай Ф., Алкан С. Я. О политических ценностях и предпочтениях студенческой молодежи Казахстана // Социологические исследования. 2024. № 4. С. 148–152. DOI: 10.31857/50132162524040135.
- 2. Ben-Nun Bloom P., Arikan G. (2012) A Two-Edged Sword: The Differential Effect of Religious Belief and Religious Social Context on Attitudes Towards Democracy. Political Behavior. Vol. 34. No. 2: 307–332.
- 3. Cankurtaran O.C., Buz S., Hatiboglu B. (2013) Youth and Political Participation: Case in Turkey. European Journal of Social Work. Vol. 16. No. 2: 249–262.
- 4. The Culture Factor. (2023) Country Comparison: Kazakhstan, Turkey. URL: https://www.theculturefactor.com/country-comparison-tool?countries=kazakhstan, turkey (accessed 08.08.2025).
- 5. Esen B., Gumuscu S. (2016) Rising Competitive Authoritarianism in Turkey. Third World Quarterly. Vol. 37. No. 9: 1581–1606.
- 6. Ibadildin N., Primiano C. (2024) Understanding 'Bloody January' 2022: a 'Limited Access Order' in Kazakhstan. Asian Affairs. Vol. 55. No. 4: 623–647.
- 7. Kazakhstan: Freedom in the World. (2024) URL: https://freedomhouse.org/country/kazakhstan/freedom-world/2024 (accessed 08.08.2025).
- 8. Kutlay M., Óniş Z. (2024) Governance Crises and Resilience of Authoritarian Populism: 2023 Turkish Elections from the Perspective of Hirschman's 'Exit, Voice and Loyalty'. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. Vol. 24. No. 2: 383–403.
- 9. Norris P. (1999) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford University Press.
- 10. Öney B., Ardag M. (2022) The Relationship between Diffuse Support for Democracy and Governing Party Support in a Hybrid Regime: Evidence with Four Representative Samples from Turkey. Turkish Studies. Vol. 23. No. 1: 31–55.
- 11. Özsoy B. (2023) 'Türk Dünyası' Söylemi İçinde Türk Devletleri Teşkilatı'nın Rolü Ve Önemi. Anasay. Vol. 25: 40–55.
- 12. Toros E. (2010) The Relationship between Islam and Democracy in Turkey: Employing Political Culture as an Indicator. Social Indicators Research. Vol. 95. No. 2: 253–265.
- 13. Turkey: Freedom in the World. (2024) URL: https://freedomhouse.org/country/turkey/freedom-world/2024 (accessed 08.08.2025).
- 14. TÜİK. (2023) İşgücü İstatistikleri. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. URK: https://data.tulk.gov.tr (accessed 08.08.2025).
- 15. Yeşilada B.A. (2023) The AKP, Religion and Political Values in Contemporary Turkey: Implications for the Future of Democracy. Turkish Studies. Vol. 24. No. 3–4: 593–616.
