Везде
Evil and atheism: Ontological and ethical prerequisites in arguments from evil
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Evil and atheism: Ontological and ethical prerequisites in arguments from evil
Annotation
PII
S2072-07260000616-6-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Igor Gasparov 
Edition
Volume 13 Issue 1
Pages
53-68
Abstract
One of the main objections to the existence of God is the so-called argument from evil. In a general form, it says that if a good and omnipotent God existed, He would necessarily prevent many evils we encounter in the actual world. Yet these evils do occur. Therefore, the good and omnipotent God does not exist. This argument has not only theoretical, but also practical aspects. Especially, if one decides in favor of atheism, he is guided by a particular understanding of what evil is and what a benevolent and omnipotent God has to do in order to prevent its occurrence. The goal of this article is to reveal the concepts of evil and «divine obligations» that underlie the atheistic motivation. In this case, as an ex­ample of logical argument from evil I consider the classic argument by John L. Mackie, whereas as an example of an inductive argument from evil is taken the well-known argu­ment developed by William L. Rowe. It is shown that despite the fact that from a formal point of view, these arguments refer to different types of arguments from evil, they are based on similar ideas about both the nature of evil and God’s obligations in relation to his creation. It is also shown that atheistic arguments from evil suggest, on the one hand, a quasi-dualistic account of the nature of evil, according to which evil is the absolute op­posite of good. On the other hand, it seems to claim God's subordination to the welfare-oriented moral, which implies the concern for the welfare of all rational and sentient be­ings to be an unconditional duty.
Keywords
problem of evil, atheism, atheology, theism, analytic philosophy of religion
Date of publication
01.03.2020
Number of purchasers
22
Views
634
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. Appolonov, A.V. (tr.) Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, Pt. I: Questiones 1‒64. Moscow: S.A. Savin Publ., 2006. 817 pp. (In Russian)
    2. 

  2. Calder, T. “The Concept of Evil”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition), ed. by E.N. Zalta [https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/concept-evil/, accessed on 15.07.2019].
    3. 

  3. Davies, B. Thomas Aquinas on God and Evil. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. 163 pp.
    4. 

  4. Farrell, P.M. “Evil and Omnipotence”, Mind, 1958, Vol. 67, No. 267, pp. 339‒403.
    5. 

  5. Farrell, P.M. “Freedom and Evil”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 1958, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 216‒221.
    6. 

  6. Franklin, J. Corrupting the Youth. A History of Philosophy in Australia. Sydney: Macleay Press, 2003. 465 pp.
    7. 

  7. Gellman, J. “The experience of evil and support for atheism”, The Blackwell Companion to the Problem of Evil, ed. by J.P. McBrayer and D. Howard-Snyder. West Sussex: Willey Blackwell, 2013, pp. 98‒112.
    8. 

  8. Hickson, M.W. “A brief history of problems of evil”, The Blackwell Companion to the Problem of Evil, ed. by Justin P. McBrayer and D. Howard-Snyder. West Sussex: Willey Blackwell, 2013, pp. 3‒18.
    9. 

  9. Hume, D. “Dialogi o estestvennoj religii” [Dialogues on Natural Religion], trans. by S. Tzere­teli, in: D. Hume, Sochinenija [Works], Vol. 2. Moscow: Mysl' Publ., 1996, pp. 379‒482. (In Russian)
    10. 

  10. Mackie, J.L. “Evil and Omnipotence”, Mind, 1955, Vol. 64, No. 254, pp. 200‒212.
    11. 

  11. Mackie, J.L. The Miracle of Theism. Arguments for and against the Existence of God. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982. 268 pp.
    12. 

  12. Murphy, M.C. God’s Own Ethics. Norms of Divine Agency and the Argument from Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. 210 pp.
    13. 

  13. Oppy, G. “Rowe’s Evidential Argument from Evil”, The Blackwell Companion to the Problem of Evil, ed. by J.P. McBrayer and D. Howard-Snyder. West Sussex: Willey Blackwell, 2013, pp. 49‒66.
    14. 

  14. Oppy, G. “Logical Arguments from Evil and Free-Will Defences”, The Cambridge Companion to the Problem of Evil, ed. by C. Meister and P.K. Moser. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, pp. 45‒64.
    15. 

  15. Rowe, W. “The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 1979, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 355‒341.
    16. 

  16. Russell, B. “The Persistent Problem of Evil”, Faith and Philosophy, 1989, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 121‒139.
    17. 

  17. Russell, B. “The Problem of Evil”, Theism and Atheism. Opposing Arguments in Philosophy, ed. by J.W. Koterski and G. Oppy. Farmington Hills, Mich.: Macmillan Reference USA, 2019, pp. 539‒549.
    18. 

  18. Seregin, A.V. “Ob aksiologicheskom ateizme” [On Axiological Atheism], Svoevolie filosofii: sobranie filosofskich esse [Self-Willing Philosophy: a collection of philosophical essays], ed. by O.P. Zubetz. Moscow: LRS Publ., 2019, pp. 420‒433. (In Russian)
    19. 

  19. Torchia, N.J. Creatio ex nihilo and the Theology of St. Augustine. The Anti-Manichaean Polemic and Beyond. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, 1999. 281 pp.
    20. 

  20. Trakakis, N. The God beyond Belief: In Defense of William Rowe’s Evidential Argument from Evil. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006. 375 pp.
    21.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate